Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Feedback-ID: i21f147d5:Fastmail
Date:   Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:44:18 -0600
From:   Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.pizza>
To:     "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc:     "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
        Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: __fatal_signal_pending() should also check
 PF_EXITING
Message-ID: <YuFdUj5X4qckC/6g@tycho.pizza>
References: <Ys2PwTS0qFmGNFqy@netflix>
 <20220713175305.1327649-1-tycho@tycho.pizza>
 <20220720150328.GA30749@mail.hallyn.com>
 <YthsgqAZYnwHZLn+@tycho.pizza>
 <20220721015459.GA4297@mail.hallyn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220721015459.GA4297@mail.hallyn.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi all,

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 08:54:59PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Oh - I didn't either - checking the sigkill in shared signals *seems*
> legit if they can be put there - but since you posted the new patch I
> assumed his reasoning was clear to you.  I know Eric's busy, cc:ing Oleg
> for his interpretation too.

Any thoughts on this?

Thanks,

Tycho