Received: by 2002:ac0:e34a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g10csp484139imn; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vqRBZIc+fI5ZkdEVJlRAqN4VSj8wRUK8gd2B8jCjHXKYp+in4JxhnXt5ZNgjNIQnZy9/al X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:160f:b0:72f:1442:ed54 with SMTP id hb15-20020a170907160f00b0072f1442ed54mr17769741ejc.339.1658946548286; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658946548; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y2Z7wbDuq3EBJZcIKl3DDTWghQY6lLUqdkKjh+nQrbrWh77hursXZkftlqnmKKMpM/ VHMxp+xQEmvn2Zx+OPX+hT7SImb2wE4QamMD76LxB7TL2e3cFjhXm4XGP4NzaBcnU/q+ urWYOTm7Jk4PwLy17s4M3HVosfGlosJBirkywzwiX4lvtmofC0j5RjrIszfNrcnMhzBw 4tMeFWNyQdI7uiPJn/LpAKDwPpvNsJ2Q5LIfgrHigIZT5ou9Q1dZRflt3Hq6uz8J1/8J a5zZyF05/d/5Q7oPc20zxMiWEgpv2mJUvmpFMj7PcAevm13kqAgjxE1zKLu0xwcMhKYi x+ag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=2Jztxm6o9xsyWevxQs9EdsI835CqcLtsbvdLxEipgGI=; b=jtQT63nuoX8mhC5lL6rcYWnFVMP2LBtQCx8KcJx887uTmfTFCTn4f5m9CQyPvHJ0sN 1QmmrNah6ezkhkgAR/6p2dvcegDYkVi4M6lurjhVya4ZVp8N+qnVFsXy6+lHYdfCEfJ9 mHQnvVjNHebUm6H0EWWVnBblJfUr6B6kdRkNHlQD86xS+vkPbSdY/yngJDNjININqQfp M297szTGI9ZIY4wF0pqF1ZdgS04QOeos32Y/cTOGYDhwdgCIfJyhsVQwbjNVn4iH6c1h V6yYIjpDenVsYBLhWuWGPuzgA5SzdMv4mjq7qlq4iWwNBwQU1HS15+dy0cnPWOjmng6n wW7A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=s6emZUhj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q5-20020a5085c5000000b0043c8ac1ad11si3718389edh.618.2022.07.27.11.28.43; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=s6emZUhj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235133AbiG0QWg (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:22:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49526 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234075AbiG0QWK (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 12:22:10 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017504BD3F; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 09:22:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A64D619AC; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96B05C433D6; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 16:22:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1658938929; bh=XxsZqC5lRPgiVb1BfJ8Az073MMEg2CsJPLRQC8M4CNo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=s6emZUhjGR2TFX8gXxNZ9jSq4hPCrZAYo+nYGrW5uSSU+E5Qb0NrdDe7aPaY7xd1b 6yQ7g16pI0sv+x99Yx2XvDIqMpF9RsWJxAY0p+2Saxx2ZNS4OfAdxymyQO4XiuIxtA 5ayUBE5yAai3oy4UHjjwJjrahVLmlKEPiU+Q23/8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Wang Cheng , syzbot+217f792c92599518a2ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Andrew Morton Subject: [PATCH 4.9 18/26] mm/mempolicy: fix uninit-value in mpol_rebind_policy() Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 18:10:47 +0200 Message-Id: <20220727160959.847927953@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1 In-Reply-To: <20220727160959.122591422@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20220727160959.122591422@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Wang Cheng commit 018160ad314d75b1409129b2247b614a9f35894c upstream. mpol_set_nodemask()(mm/mempolicy.c) does not set up nodemask when pol->mode is MPOL_LOCAL. Check pol->mode before access pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed in mpol_rebind_policy()(mm/mempolicy.c). BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_policy mm/mempolicy.c:352 [inline] BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_task+0x2ac/0x2c0 mm/mempolicy.c:368 mpol_rebind_policy mm/mempolicy.c:352 [inline] mpol_rebind_task+0x2ac/0x2c0 mm/mempolicy.c:368 cpuset_change_task_nodemask kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:1711 [inline] cpuset_attach+0x787/0x15e0 kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c:2278 cgroup_migrate_execute+0x1023/0x1d20 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2515 cgroup_migrate kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2771 [inline] cgroup_attach_task+0x540/0x8b0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:2804 __cgroup1_procs_write+0x5cc/0x7a0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c:520 cgroup1_tasks_write+0x94/0xb0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup-v1.c:539 cgroup_file_write+0x4c2/0x9e0 kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:3852 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x66a/0x9f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:296 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2162 [inline] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:503 [inline] vfs_write+0x1318/0x2030 fs/read_write.c:590 ksys_write+0x28b/0x510 fs/read_write.c:643 __do_sys_write fs/read_write.c:655 [inline] __se_sys_write fs/read_write.c:652 [inline] __x64_sys_write+0xdb/0x120 fs/read_write.c:652 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Uninit was created at: slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:524 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:3251 [inline] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:3259 [inline] kmem_cache_alloc+0x902/0x11c0 mm/slub.c:3264 mpol_new mm/mempolicy.c:293 [inline] do_set_mempolicy+0x421/0xb70 mm/mempolicy.c:853 kernel_set_mempolicy mm/mempolicy.c:1504 [inline] __do_sys_set_mempolicy mm/mempolicy.c:1510 [inline] __se_sys_set_mempolicy+0x44c/0xb60 mm/mempolicy.c:1507 __x64_sys_set_mempolicy+0xd8/0x110 mm/mempolicy.c:1507 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:51 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x54/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:82 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_task (2) https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=d6eb90f952c2a5de9ea718a1b873c55cb13b59dc This patch seems to fix below bug too. KMSAN: uninit-value in mpol_rebind_mm (2) https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f2fecd0d7013f54ec4162f60743a2b28df40926b The uninit-value is pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed in mpol_rebind_policy(). When syzkaller reproducer runs to the beginning of mpol_new(), mpol_new() mm/mempolicy.c do_mbind() mm/mempolicy.c kernel_mbind() mm/mempolicy.c `mode` is 1(MPOL_PREFERRED), nodes_empty(*nodes) is `true` and `flags` is 0. Then mode = MPOL_LOCAL; ... policy->mode = mode; policy->flags = flags; will be executed. So in mpol_set_nodemask(), mpol_set_nodemask() mm/mempolicy.c do_mbind() kernel_mbind() pol->mode is 4 (MPOL_LOCAL), that `nodemask` in `pol` is not initialized, which will be accessed in mpol_rebind_policy(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220512123428.fq3wofedp6oiotd4@ppc.localdomain Signed-off-by: Wang Cheng Reported-by: Tested-by: Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/mm/mempolicy.c +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ static void mpol_rebind_preferred(struct static void mpol_rebind_policy(struct mempolicy *pol, const nodemask_t *newmask, enum mpol_rebind_step step) { - if (!pol) + if (!pol || pol->mode == MPOL_LOCAL) return; if (!mpol_store_user_nodemask(pol) && step == MPOL_REBIND_ONCE && nodes_equal(pol->w.cpuset_mems_allowed, *newmask))