Received: by 2002:ac0:e34a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g10csp487673imn; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1t6mh18GG8UbBPpJ0Lx3NVRJunh91yOKDACIg6dP+E6ZorC0Bi8+hdfLC6at1/ZSL515pcG X-Received: by 2002:aa7:df0e:0:b0:43c:e31e:d054 with SMTP id c14-20020aa7df0e000000b0043ce31ed054mr3421edy.373.1658946872081; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658946872; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=C4O9RXRu+eHM14tMJs6XGlza7qON+AvAlvfGMb09fYBLrOxPL8o0eYvvZPr9RjKsWy Ng8sp75JACfvQ/3US4vX7ZTcY2QMuqWKlh5sbvujcDMnOLZlBW2w+jvSjKnCVXYkncAI ng1EgIO1wJh2QuoRMsOqkCBgaUaTT7eDk+QXXAs4f1OkiihADodi7jQLGkhpodJwNwPT CqGwTBtvKuca4fjpHs4FyqC8UOk8bMESb7/MuQPj6micprBRfRF/tc/5xBqkuP4IkkOc ZAmleJYL599KFAyK1ndflhEhmqnZs2msY2vHGwkK+MQkE4W8gqRnf8BCbOs0NKL5CbdM C1BQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=itvgIbCL8AlCfcLB9DTtKEyVMfAWjYXvrHFZiAXSjJg=; b=IZBCtulq9IbrOfj8PBWGBcwcAev5tLCg6yHflPcv+6/aW1/lvrLTo7eXrjkH3x0+6C S05pxS1U690To0AJO2KQebCTkzDCBa+TgcTacGyAt2tHqjSfFjUIMRkgPICFO1cVmL/B OOwYAd4XG6bAd4SDVnGZl9SPa6kRnd2GmAp2q5Vqdrw4EsigoqgSg5XU5XXmG/yTTOSl L5cRUQ0AFOMEIptXJpYQkdBKXHlf+2VI3CzivTQWwHfE3/FoyoArTcKQwN2t4BphAdBb 2x+gGS7iycZWyVAioODbG5qvd6+Lav0MTm1pEDPvaOnRCmnNiJvplhoh1uFe3b3oYj+D 1JIg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Bcmb33Ex; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l6-20020a056402254600b0043be0095153si14298638edb.439.2022.07.27.11.34.04; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=Bcmb33Ex; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243340AbiG0SO1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:14:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243432AbiG0SOL (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 14:14:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0940822BE4; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id a89so1582087edf.5; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:15:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=itvgIbCL8AlCfcLB9DTtKEyVMfAWjYXvrHFZiAXSjJg=; b=Bcmb33ExgzjD085FFT10aS3qwRAirdFEfJ39vDABC6q7rHl2PTaaAIy/C1NBIPMpXw z2j+wMRGCtX1egbdOJbGI+GWPB0uFOGb+gPnd2VuxOaX4LxooBPkn0zlOXCgOeebr4LF D10HTuidi7HVbJkor0ZQLddZUwg73iz03jgt5jMOue/9/iuleHHrltNh0feiIRQMmKie 4keYy9hJiVnVts4n5ZKcpORvaZ3NXWqkBEHFy4KKzSgh0TVfgzvOyheQHMVra/jmggfC i8XTPHIFHWzK1TFxS/ggEVxm+b5wXhEOmyvHEkWSub2A7pUiQSrYrJW3DBCcE+OtH5SN DKtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=itvgIbCL8AlCfcLB9DTtKEyVMfAWjYXvrHFZiAXSjJg=; b=61iJ5QlUwBCPmB7NMkVRZuzTcJtLkSYXJfvoUdUE/MsMFe6AXfMeQLTlB1apiSR2pq 6sFr9Kr3ZZjbIffojfAy6dDRXfJYDQ7IMJE/RsAEqdu8n9/BtM5HULnRmCu2GRIuRoF3 6DBkebxs1JJDTXWOPDpwrUOuOfGBROBvUarqgQs51R8X3gKPDEGhWa0OQr8zLKDfU5AL GBW0mbLIlHMAftLzAIcdx6VHtj6YMw+u2EnmN4TwCB8woC6welYaiV9/9JlO20Y0Ytvd uPiaDD0KdKiXJeIgzfReowWWVptuy6RneZPSiK1pUnDOpnW9VaviI/OqX/r+dJqi8uvq PxQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+Nos+n03AWWTU50otxjRN71sUoZkmerQLbgTLI/Dtsf+cHZ6+G NZMKfAHfHNXwQknbbsltU8RBUoklBxEmvKL3qGc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:280b:b0:43b:5d75:fcfa with SMTP id h11-20020a056402280b00b0043b5d75fcfamr24007933ede.114.1658942118376; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 10:15:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220727164133.973930-1-potin.lai.pt@gmail.com> <20220727164133.973930-3-potin.lai.pt@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20220727164133.973930-3-potin.lai.pt@gmail.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 19:14:40 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: humidity: hdc100x: add manufacturer and device ID check To: Potin Lai Cc: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , Patrick Williams , Potin Lai , linux-iio , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 6:43 PM Potin Lai wrote: > > Add manufacturer and device ID checking during probe, and skip the > checking if chip model not supported. > > Supported: > - HDC1000 > - HDC1010 > - HDC1050 > - HDC1080 > > Not supported: > - HDC1008 Almost there! ... > +static bool is_valid_hdc100x(struct i2c_client *client) > +{ > + const struct hdc100x_chip_data *data; > + int mfr_id, dev_id; > + data = device_get_match_data(&client->dev); > + if (!data->support_mfr_check) > + return true; Logically this part does belong to ->probe() and doesn't here (too wide for this specific helper). > + mfr_id = hdc100x_read_mfr_id(client); > + dev_id = hdc100x_read_dev_id(client); > + if (mfr_id == HDC100X_MFR_ID && > + (dev_id == 0x1000 || dev_id == 0x1050)) > + return true; > + > + return false; > +} ... > + if (!is_valid_hdc100x(client)) > + return -EINVAL; Means here you add const struct hdc100x_chip_data *data; struct device *dev = &client->dev; ... data = device_get_match_data(dev); if (data->support_mfr_check && !is_valid_hdc100x(client)) return -EINVAL; (Introducing a temporary variable for struct device pointer might also help in future to refactor to make code neater.) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko