Received: by 2002:ac0:e34a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g10csp221323imn; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:10:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1s1TWOhF5/nXNFKxnOD7SpwfwY7h2K9GDDgrZ5+kn2n+A1I1DkFadyZPzK8T2MJe9V3a2nD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:e96:b0:43a:f21f:42a0 with SMTP id h22-20020a0564020e9600b0043af21f42a0mr26516452eda.382.1658981450684; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:10:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1658981450; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pIQJlXoGPtKapvgOVCKcsBGIy0g4HffVQDALP/3AmfH5McPtBAaaBg2X8ZnsoYprlq jaPwbaPU1uvfKAth79TiSG6KQtJerMfYfRsvZREmryrB3WF67Z2CZKT9sr4hJnW49Mrt Z182C+1YsYipkr8rb7rdeK1zYpCS7LjqZ6jjWPxTsPka8yg3Z0TrJHWdVQkjNDOFb7io zyLOcb4rZfmLRfn3Ti92xJlfIlX1gSLNQjvBH69Fg7HI5k8CovluhquhKCFr3wu0hvM+ EnAEEugvvRI1d5n/RUSXt3R0591voc2F3n/mj1BPpAfvOPcG7bHtQqL0z0wmxue0ob1i +qEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=zsBBY7J2O6DHatiZO2ZjIJu31CKlahj9deWKvSVl5+4=; b=IPKHo8F1m/NoFaRbnuhvJutpuswoj+GK56bHrNVRoxPDpQWiFccvKWg2PX28CV86qW 3MvCu8UML6RawMH7vjetjIAVgkXB5Mw42GQHecN1eanm1tAv4W6Bbel81bxRl0OhC13O a1ZeVcjWQw0qgyQkWl0vQysTQZSd6+AHJ3WyN/WvmwCRvcaX824uLWnVhSUJD/BchmV9 lmRm0t8KIcXkfpCzP05FtITJEqXvGrLTtojfMtjbIvAtoqYYU4I5d3sEdLDP9IblMo1p aH00L3RquCusiTZMfE8mQdUxdgo89JWy0iHv6JheF+eE5Cp5muuYT0Wu13kMuRVqB9XA j7pw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=kP1z3pws; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jx23-20020a170907761700b007262cd54996si13316791ejc.457.2022.07.27.21.10.25; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 21:10:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=kP1z3pws; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234791AbiG1D6G (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 23:58:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234085AbiG1D6F (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jul 2022 23:58:05 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C6C481FF for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2022 20:58:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1658980684; x=1690516684; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=rveEgmV9RWZSzZ8jsgQMx2q5Z94soNvnQgHkt+FOIVI=; b=kP1z3pwsAoEt9h8A7X/Uf0eId2jmxgUII7h4eQf2oTKlxEG9epS18wtl b8X6klidnn7dkYM6pO9S/CGnf8i7kdaZzdH5W3QpdNb19L2A55mcsVpl9 wnf/iWk/3O3TQxHM38Gdc+rJYCyEJ06zs/3o61NaMT9WiJqwCn6ji21kG NJCuAHh6B6IiQala8LEqAaQjrxoR+Nn2FdPthVIjITBxBF0mqbLccLhJ6 NxHTXExjpBP9qFwfBuS6D7erI4XkfbiWnyrjxAbW9AjGjqvaLD0SKMWEm 0UFE5sPkdGhvLOcndIX4f4yRDQ4PDue/FWz6lxY6mkuj4wsuz5zG+iT5p g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10421"; a="288425994" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,196,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="288425994" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Jul 2022 20:58:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,196,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="668640698" Received: from q.bj.intel.com ([10.238.154.102]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Jul 2022 20:58:01 -0700 From: shaoqin.huang@intel.com To: rppt@kernel.org Cc: Shaoqin Huang , Karolina Drobnik , David Hildenbrand , Rebecca Mckeever , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] memblock test: Add test to memblock_add() 129th region Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 13:00:47 -0600 Message-Id: <20220728190051.237437-1-shaoqin.huang@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Shaoqin Huang Add 129th region into the memblock, and this will trigger the memblock_double_array() function, this needs valid memory regions. So using dummy_physical_memory_init() to allocate some valid memory, when memblock_double_array() choose a new memory region from memory.regions, it will always choose a valid memory region if we add all valid memory region, so the memblock_double_array() must success. Another thing should be done is to restore the memory.regions after memblock_double_array(), due to now the memory.regions is pointing to a memory region allocated by dummy_physical_memory_init(). And it will affect the subsequent tests if we don't restore the memory region. So Simply record the origin region, and restore it after the test. Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang --- tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c | 9 ++-- tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c index 66f46f261e66..ded93f97d98e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/basic_api.c @@ -326,6 +326,70 @@ static int memblock_add_twice_check(void) return 0; } +static int memblock_add_many_check(void) +{ + int i; + void *base[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1]; + void *orig_region; + struct region r = { + .base = SZ_16K, + .size = MEM_SIZE, + }; + + PREFIX_PUSH(); + + reset_memblock_regions(); + memblock_allow_resize(); + + for (i = 0; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; i++) { + dummy_physical_memory_init(); + append_memblock(); + base[i] = memory_block.base; + + assert(memblock.memory.cnt == i + 1); + assert(memblock.memory.total_size == (i + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + } + + orig_region = memblock.memory.regions; + + /* This adds the 129 memory_region, and makes it double array. */ + dummy_physical_memory_init(); + append_memblock(); + base[i] = memory_block.base; + + assert(memblock.memory.cnt == INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1); + assert(memblock.memory.total_size == (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1) * MEM_SIZE); + assert(memblock.memory.max == INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + /* The base is very small, so it should be insert to the first region. */ + memblock_add(r.base, r.size); + assert(memblock.memory.regions[0].base == r.base); + assert(memblock.memory.regions[0].size == r.size); + + assert(memblock.memory.cnt == INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2); + assert(memblock.memory.total_size == (INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 2) * MEM_SIZE); + assert(memblock.memory.max == INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS * 2); + + /* Free these allocated memory. */ + for (i = 0; i < INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS + 1; i++) { + memory_block.base = base[i]; + dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(); + } + + /* + * The current memory.regions is occupying a range of memory that + * allocated from dummy_physical_memory_init(). After free the memory, + * we must not use it. So restore the origin memory region to make sure + * the tests can run as normal and not affected by the double array. + */ + memblock.memory.regions = orig_region; + memblock.memory.cnt = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; + + test_pass_pop(); + + return 0; +} + static int memblock_add_checks(void) { prefix_reset(); @@ -339,6 +403,7 @@ static int memblock_add_checks(void) memblock_add_overlap_bottom_check(); memblock_add_within_check(); memblock_add_twice_check(); + memblock_add_many_check(); prefix_pop(); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c index e43b2676af81..4741e860123a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.c @@ -5,12 +5,10 @@ #include #include -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 -#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS #define PREFIXES_MAX 15 #define DELIM ": " -static struct test_memory memory_block; +struct test_memory memory_block; static const char __maybe_unused *prefixes[PREFIXES_MAX]; static int __maybe_unused nr_prefixes; @@ -64,6 +62,11 @@ void setup_memblock(void) memblock_add((phys_addr_t)memory_block.base, MEM_SIZE); } +void append_memblock(void) +{ + memblock_add((phys_addr_t)memory_block.base, MEM_SIZE); +} + void dummy_physical_memory_init(void) { memory_block.base = malloc(MEM_SIZE); diff --git a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h index 3e7f23d341d7..8946a3b77f24 100644 --- a/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h +++ b/tools/testing/memblock/tests/common.h @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ #include <../selftests/kselftest.h> #define MEM_SIZE SZ_16K +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS 128 +#define INIT_MEMBLOCK_RESERVED_REGIONS INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS /** * ASSERT_EQ(): @@ -65,9 +67,12 @@ struct region { phys_addr_t size; }; +extern struct test_memory memory_block; + void reset_memblock_regions(void); void reset_memblock_attributes(void); void setup_memblock(void); +void append_memblock(void); void dummy_physical_memory_init(void); void dummy_physical_memory_cleanup(void); void parse_args(int argc, char **argv); -- 2.30.2