Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934043AbXFFA0b (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:26:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933081AbXFFA0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:26:23 -0400 Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:46259 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763448AbXFFA0X (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:26:23 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.2 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Russell King , David Miller , alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, hch@infradead.org, mroos@linux.ee, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libata & no PCI: dma_[un]map_single undefined In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:16:25 EDT." <20070605221625.GU31565@havoc.gtf.org> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20070605151104.GG31565@havoc.gtf.org> <20070605151847.GD2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605152133.GE2572@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605.122745.118950378.davem@davemloft.net> <20070605212523.GB18027@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605213815.GA19648@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605214830.GS31565@havoc.gtf.org> <20070605220345.GA22705@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20070605221625.GU31565@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1181089515_19483P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:25:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20436.1181089515@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1705 Lines: 42 --==_Exmh_1181089515_19483P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:16:25 EDT, Jeff Garzik said: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:03:45PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > And rather than configuring your MUA to ignore the header... > > > You're using mutt, mutt can be configured so. > > So, you are seriously proposing that EVERYONE reconfigure their MUA, > because you are sending out bad headers? > > Don't you think that is an unscalable solution, and an imposition? Not only is it unscalable, it almost by definition is anti-social. The only times I've actually seen one in the wild, it's because some subscriber to a mailing list wishes to subvert the list's culture in a manner worse than a Reply-To: header. I considered adding support for Mail-Followup-To: to the exmh MUA, but decided against it, because it would basically mean that every time I got one, I'd have to curse and moan and put the To: and cc: back the way everybody *else* on the list wanted those to headers to behave. Kind of hard to motivate myself to write Tk/Tcl code that will just mean a *worse* user experience for myself... --==_Exmh_1181089515_19483P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFGZf7rcC3lWbTT17ARAlSMAJ452BV78rAKNiZbsVUiy2jwE2CviACg5b2G yzSuDJ1ajBujwEyGgjUeyj8= =Sz4C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1181089515_19483P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/