Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934311AbXFFAqg (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:46:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933309AbXFFAqY (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:46:24 -0400 Received: from [198.99.130.12] ([198.99.130.12]:54093 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933306AbXFFAqX (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:46:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:37:52 -0400 From: Jeff Dike To: Andrew Morton Cc: LKML , uml-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64 Message-ID: <20070606003752.GA11511@c2.user-mode-linux.org> References: <20070605205055.GA9770@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20070605170001.c8b2110e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070605170001.c8b2110e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 864 Lines: 29 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400 > Jeff Dike wrote: > > > [ This is 2.6.22 material ] > > > > Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by > > Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks. > That means the Kconfig rules are wrong, surely? I'm far from a Kconfig expert, but what I have is config KERNEL_STACK_ORDER int "Kernel stack size order" default 1 if 64BIT default 0 if !64BIT which seems reasonably clear and simple... Jeff -- Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/