Received: by 2002:ac0:b7d5:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v21csp15835ime; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:19:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1uaiMCRUbffy39RjH2N8KYorl4OuWyRV1wJRL3dF2hUXpTd4Q6n60I85PpU3pdJ9SOIVavU X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:a40b:b0:72b:64e3:4c5e with SMTP id sg11-20020a170907a40b00b0072b64e34c5emr718801ejc.612.1659046753591; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:19:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659046753; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eAmTmA2+myQDzQr4cC5WL2mBcIJfLFA9bogUUnpCKfh5T/A74+QrWkqFP+9XgkmAmv UXFHs23zOjp+Qm7aaM/AJ9OCMw0t6evWdXsM1IFqjl5DrvBHXzscPV1t9+WPq3dcyC2j qoVl+gJ7tb8AULuLpG8iNjorNiRvuVe9JUkKaKFXLVCXwPpctYMm6vxCgqjw4P8q94o/ P5GyqXC9NaCuw1D0fbQHdEuoWH/6wC7czKMkNYz+1EM69mRwORNsTM4Eml27x+wvfYvc Vh7mp7Ea8dNK6nRfnHdKkvwG5JjHSaR68hP4M9jbgSoWEAdkxbhXsVomK/Saec3tapr1 pLlg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=3cIxVZe9blaRPxdcZjK3PBh5O50PHhwTj5OjmmHT2wk=; b=MEHJmLWUPc7kkr+QxqS87kvxnVrpYTOn3meGT6VTCYWRzwJWSk6Tgr/3hCWrDuHI5G Ahl7RpweOtJXNl/zaNGnm2S1mqWrN285/97FSRbApHFf+aSEqdlopZ7liZ555ACBx5Pi fVBLF21K+8zKaZAtDY9sDXGY3u95s9+X3UCs49PXv07GaCyAahIxbkONlqC7DPLXfIZ9 yTl7AU8h8nmehUZonAYtXXYhPhyJOSkCQl8sYP8LVYfDynccpgau2Z6b+xBMd7XTyq5j enxTEYfE3rYGxPxVRSNrCukbvG13MRoPZJBUm8f1F/wdlG3RugqLxIyR+IGfbMSFUEQV ueeA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c9-20020a05640227c900b0043c8fe319dasi1731543ede.189.2022.07.28.15.18.49; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232118AbiG1WLo (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:11:44 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50484 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230005AbiG1WLh (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:11:37 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264DA78DF7; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:11:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A42113E; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:11:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com (mammon-tx2.austin.arm.com [10.118.28.62]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B64233F70D; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:11:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jeremy Linton To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, robert.moore@intel.com, devel@acpica.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Linton Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] ACPI: CPPC: Disable FIE if registers in PCC regions Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 17:10:43 -0500 Message-Id: <20220728221043.4161903-2-jeremy.linton@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20220728221043.4161903-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> References: <20220728221043.4161903-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org PCC regions utilize a mailbox to set/retrieve register values used by the CPPC code. This is fine as long as the operations are infrequent. With the FIE code enabled though the overhead can range from 2-11% of system CPU overhead (ex: as measured by top) on Arm based machines. So, before enabling FIE assure none of the registers used by cppc_get_perf_ctrs() are in the PCC region. Furthermore lets also enable a module parameter which can also disable it at boot or module reload. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 19 ++++++++++++---- include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index 3c6d4ef87be0..38b881db14c7 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -1246,6 +1246,47 @@ int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpunum, struct cppc_perf_caps *perf_caps) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_get_perf_caps); +/** + * cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc - Check if any perf counters are in a PCC region. + * + * CPPC has flexibility about how counters describing CPU perf are delivered. + * One of the choices is PCC regions, which can have a high access latency. This + * routine allows callers of cppc_get_perf_ctrs() to know this ahead of time. + * + * Return: true if any of the counters are in PCC regions, false otherwise + */ +bool cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc(void) +{ + int cpu; + + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) { + struct cpc_register_resource *ref_perf_reg; + struct cpc_desc *cpc_desc; + + cpc_desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, cpu); + + if (CPC_IN_PCC(&cpc_desc->cpc_regs[DELIVERED_CTR]) || + CPC_IN_PCC(&cpc_desc->cpc_regs[REFERENCE_CTR]) || + CPC_IN_PCC(&cpc_desc->cpc_regs[CTR_WRAP_TIME])) + return true; + + + ref_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[REFERENCE_PERF]; + + /* + * If reference perf register is not supported then we should + * use the nominal perf value + */ + if (!CPC_SUPPORTED(ref_perf_reg)) + ref_perf_reg = &cpc_desc->cpc_regs[NOMINAL_PERF]; + + if (CPC_IN_PCC(ref_perf_reg)) + return true; + } + return false; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc); + /** * cppc_get_perf_ctrs - Read a CPU's performance feedback counters. * @cpunum: CPU from which to read counters. diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c index 24eaf0ec344d..ed607e27d6bb 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c @@ -63,7 +63,11 @@ static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = { static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver; +static bool fie_disabled; + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE +module_param(fie_disabled, bool, 0444); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(fie_disabled, "Disable Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE)"); /* Frequency invariance support */ struct cppc_freq_invariance { @@ -158,7 +162,7 @@ static void cppc_cpufreq_cpu_fie_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; int cpu, ret; - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled) return; for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) { @@ -199,7 +203,7 @@ static void cppc_cpufreq_cpu_fie_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) struct cppc_freq_invariance *cppc_fi; int cpu; - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled) return; /* policy->cpus will be empty here, use related_cpus instead */ @@ -229,7 +233,12 @@ static void __init cppc_freq_invariance_init(void) }; int ret; - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc()) { + pr_debug("FIE not enabled on systems with registers in PCC\n"); + fie_disabled = true; + } + + if (fie_disabled) return; kworker_fie = kthread_create_worker(0, "cppc_fie"); @@ -247,7 +256,7 @@ static void __init cppc_freq_invariance_init(void) static void cppc_freq_invariance_exit(void) { - if (cppc_cpufreq_driver.get == hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate) + if (fie_disabled) return; kthread_destroy_worker(kworker_fie); @@ -940,6 +949,8 @@ static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void) } } + fie_disabled = true; + acpi_put_table(tbl); } diff --git a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h index d389bab54241..fe6dc3e5a454 100644 --- a/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h +++ b/include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h @@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ extern int cppc_get_perf_ctrs(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *perf_fb_ctrs); extern int cppc_set_perf(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_ctrls *perf_ctrls); extern int cppc_set_enable(int cpu, bool enable); extern int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_caps *caps); +extern bool cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc(void); extern bool acpi_cpc_valid(void); extern bool cppc_allow_fast_switch(void); extern int acpi_get_psd_map(unsigned int cpu, struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data); @@ -173,6 +174,10 @@ static inline int cppc_get_perf_caps(int cpu, struct cppc_perf_caps *caps) { return -ENOTSUPP; } +static inline bool cppc_perf_ctrs_in_pcc(void) +{ + return false; +} static inline bool acpi_cpc_valid(void) { return false; -- 2.35.3