Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <a139a8475fe295ac9f17064269cd0312dca6f96e.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] LoongArch: Support new relocation types
From:   Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To:     Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>, loongarch@lists.linux.dev
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:36:05 +0800
In-Reply-To: <0179679b736aea7258981dec2d83107cce74dfc1.camel@xry111.site>
References: <32a74a218c76611f897fd1df1ad0059068621133.camel@xry111.site>
         <ec52fd49-4a30-15d9-3d32-fd7bc6d8b3f0@loongson.cn>
         <0179679b736aea7258981dec2d83107cce74dfc1.camel@xry111.site>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 18:18 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 17:49 +0800, Youling Tang wrote:
> > Hi, Ruoyao
> >=20
> > Tested this series of patches v3 on a CLFS 5.5 system, using the new
> > cross toolchain,
> > $ dmesg | head
> > [=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0.000000] Linux version 5.19.0-rc7new-toolchain+ (l=
oongson@linux)
> > (loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc (GCC) 13.0.0 20220726 (experimental)=
=20
> > [master revision=20
> > cf7eac5805e:1e0611b64d8:3fb68f2e666d9de7e0326af9f43b12c9e98f19a6], GNU
> > ld (GNU Binutils) 2.39.50.20220726) #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 29 05:24:15
> > EDT 2022
> >=20
> > Relocation error when manually loading nf_tables.ko module,
> > $ sudo modprobe nf_tables
> > odprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'nf_tables': Exec format error
> >=20
> > $ dmesg
> > [=C2=A0=C2=A0 61.506737] kmod: module nf_tables: PCALA offset =3D 0x900=
07ffffed8c000=20
> > does not fit in 32-bit signed and is unsupported by kernel! dangerous=
=20
> > apply_r_larch_pcala_hi20 (71) relocation
> >=20
> > Do you have the same problem over there?
>=20
> I can reproduce it with "modprobe x_tables".=C2=A0 Will try to debug...

The relocation against local percpu variable is broken up.  I'll try to
fix it.

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University