Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759930AbXFFJ2v (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 05:28:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755317AbXFFJ2n (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 05:28:43 -0400 Received: from hansmi.home.forkbomb.ch ([213.144.146.165]:7486 "EHLO hansmi.home.forkbomb.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753921AbXFFJ2m (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 05:28:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:28:37 +0200 From: Michael Hanselmann To: Alan Stern Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net, linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@killerfox.forkbomb.ch Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug Message-ID: <20070606092837.GA19712@hansmi.ch> References: <20070604210555.GB12676@hansmi.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 903 Lines: 21 On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 10:24:14AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > (Depending on which version of the kernel you are looking at -- [...] > Earlier versions did behave the way you describe.) I was looking at 2.6.22-rc3 which might explain the differences. > So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you > think. I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power() > entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all. Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM? Greets, Michael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/