Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765559AbXFFOfp (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:35:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751124AbXFFOfi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:35:38 -0400 Received: from iolanthe.rowland.org ([192.131.102.54]:43895 "HELO iolanthe.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751098AbXFFOfh (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:35:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 10:35:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@iolanthe.rowland.org To: Michael Hanselmann cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, , , Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Fix NEC OHCI chip silicon bug In-Reply-To: <20070606092837.GA19712@hansmi.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 861 Lines: 21 On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Michael Hanselmann wrote: > > So the system is behaving the way you want, but not for the reason you > > think. I bet you could remove the call to usb_root_hub_lost_power() > > entirely and it wouldn't make any difference at all. > > Actually, that's true. René Nussbaumer tried without that call and it > still works as intended. Should I leave that call out and drop the > changes on usb_root_hub_lost_power for CONFIG_PM? That would be best. usb_root_hub_lost_power() is really meant to be used only when resuming from a suspend; it isn't appropriate for your situation. Alan Stern - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/