Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:33:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:31:50 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:13580 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:31:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3C0A54F4.C70C815C@evision-ventures.com> Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2001 17:21:08 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki Reply-To: dalecki@evision.ag X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Larry McVoy , Davide Libenzi , Andrew Morton , Daniel Phillips , Henning Schmiedehausen , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux/Pro [was Re: Coding style - a non-issue] In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Wasn't it you that were saying that Linux will never scale with more than > > > 2 CPUs ? > > > > No, that wasn't me. I said it shouldn't scale beyond 4 cpus. I'd be pretty > > lame if I said it couldn't scale with more than 2. Should != could. > > Question: What happens when people stick 8 threads of execution on a die with > a single L2 cache ? That had been already researched. Gogin bejoind 2 threads on a single CPU engine doesn't give you very much... The first step is giving about 25% the second only about 5%. There are papers in the IBM research magazine on this topic in context of the PowerPC. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/