Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:44:42 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bad behaviour after hdparm -M  128
Message-ID: <20070606154442.GB13166@khazad-dum.debian.net>
References: <fa.DWgGSeKzniALToNSyX9W5NibA1w@ifi.uio.no> <4666C4B9.8060408@shaw.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4666C4B9.8060408@shaw.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 889
Lines: 21

On Wed, 06 Jun 2007, Robert Hancock wrote:
> >I used kernel 2.6.21 with the libata PIIX SATA driver and a
> >Seagate ST98823AS drive.
> 
> Yes, that's expected if the drive rejects the command.

Are *all* SATA drives rejecting the command?  Mine doesn't accept it,
either.  And it should, AFAIK, unless IBM's HDAPS-enabled firmware started
ripping out accousting management from Hitachi drives, which I don't find
very likely...

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/