Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 11:38:03 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     jassisinghbrar@gmail.com
Cc:     robh@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: juno: Add missing MHU secure-irq
Message-ID: <20220801103803.5fyftr4jbgfvim7l@bogus>
References: <20220730142336.484564-1-jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
 <20220801103308.yehh7l6k4fmrxlqh@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220801103308.yehh7l6k4fmrxlqh@bogus>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 11:33:08AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 09:23:36AM -0500, jassisinghbrar@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
> > 
> > The MHU secure interrupt exists physically but is missing in the DT node.
> > 
> > Specify the interrupt in DT node to fix a warning on Arm Juno board:
> >    mhu@2b1f0000: interrupts: [[0, 36, 4], [0, 35, 4]] is too short
> >
> 
> It fails to apply on v5.18-rc1 or v5.19. Can you please rebase and resend ?
> 

Sorry I meant v5.19-rc1 or v5.19 as my -next branch is based on the former.
IIUC the interrupt-names are dropped couple of release back as it was not
in the binding.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep