Received: by 2002:ac0:e350:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g16csp1965412imn; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 06:32:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4aeHTU2xAVp77qsqOrk4tkWtmG++8PGKTreARbDvYSF0WO0UbGbsNDZ8vzmvxYa15bqpVG X-Received: by 2002:aa7:df88:0:b0:43d:3ac0:a33a with SMTP id b8-20020aa7df88000000b0043d3ac0a33amr12519193edy.157.1659360767418; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:32:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659360767; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rywyGP6dTcOrkDERoI46aG7fGHmtd+NzF4pPgRk3CtHE10SdxQRjNyq2VJN5Sz2HpD R6lXhuyxX2duFTEDd4vqBmmpAmnpzHpn5ZFmFW4YweEOA/JPABK4Ts/I3rNOi4rm/E47 vpIZXrGMbSfTrAtaOLyVoKJgrC57k0gH3cYgUcbUd7u8NdKgMjZUEClfuugATMn1YDWe HV2Ye9rmOHXAsuBwFF68IDeAnZlc39gJsF0JaT9OdKaLowJ4lp082deOjKNfYVY7ySEN tZPybkrR9upISHXbaC/pkfSm8W03pElzC0Z0NS5PZyagVh1WED3ss5Iu55R5Ec71D6QK ZCWA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date:from:dkim-signature; bh=wHG9uomB3z//oXuVAbnaYlvkAHPtRk7dQYikI60ETu8=; b=hocnIxLHm0hkgT/OV2lbxUX7795BCF7euchmPJGrAYrb5PGYhC9Xr7TIukqQ+wy6jW GAs1OAHTnGjVk+7pc+DG9oyHkq2ltjYVjWFL1JMOOWA/buqwi4iBJ7aCFzRNylWoK1+T SEMNT9oBzANw3JMITUrC2xLVaocc+gqSDzIYV2D9cD+xSTxMgB2vlEsMCiR+8WQJl3mB A46fMVd9/Q7KUH+ea32VUMunuZdCVYeHNkyUNfImv/oTKcaiQi/hEH8sESu8KLWVIaoD w/MJTp7MN0AMHUEOBW8RdikvKYAZrAH1O8rqQ2WdNoa/1KmLtEGZwn6I/JI+fIEQfc/0 q9DQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qefJ8SkB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cw22-20020a170906479600b0072b12db5f1csi1958383ejc.451.2022.08.01.06.32.21; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qefJ8SkB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231374AbiHANY1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:24:27 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54920 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231343AbiHANYY (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:24:24 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BEAD3206B; Mon, 1 Aug 2022 06:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id tk8so20324045ejc.7; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:24:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to :cc; bh=wHG9uomB3z//oXuVAbnaYlvkAHPtRk7dQYikI60ETu8=; b=qefJ8SkBCTvGg27w9gR2wFCgxb8Kj3bUrxFDjrrmwHOnwRT2AUe4aK5aYECwMYJ7gD n48a1mXOJ0mMEivPkiHqCglmYXCgp3wN7ta2Zm6RSvj3ozp39L0v3gH+L3sGmrMYUUtd otpvuJQiGBIm3B9baXxd4pGPmYOTJ1FpphXqph+zVbVgKyaqqF+Yh1RvyUII0fWzJ9wg vUpm/CIo+3SvQhZF4NK8caIfA6A9XilUqgtK6xFjlzHaU1z7c2XW/mHbE3lgZzspQGW/ C9jxUTtCDrqD5Jjd4x2XoFHCr+xPJ1u/uCMFpB34c4emwq5OwTbsapwRZO+Fevg2+dxE UqhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=wHG9uomB3z//oXuVAbnaYlvkAHPtRk7dQYikI60ETu8=; b=bxqPyJaJ8zxDzpBh542glGu49/7oPXed2hFja6P3ERZTv3DlZWSRB6NWHzPMan+G+Y C6z5FJhlfL7wHXtF2wSh9VNjF0ngTMz02fsT/deAoA/EgUromJymjzrwjmaLWIFbJuFL zeQIYYDtAeNU6I4/OFM/cWBlepZnxt0duS05StcVxbcobRsgvpxpIj8/1w7Cg5vo9hJA WEOZtmuN9wPfq6ZkeIN1bKahWxHdSIEaTL0ZDubjKx6ETMeKMcWJPzI+GiFQBEyUnOVd b/yFKe0FmfhKHI3HloNj1ExDTZpHevAfjvXmUeZQuPgsQ/3pNaDYroCtleUt1HNjUYd0 Qoig== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9tehxye7J6RzYi7hyhH2SEpbvTvKqHP3P+dHuF7L8SxE/OCW8Z 5eqdtdaVSpZqNbOts/zy+mU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:160f:b0:72f:1442:ed54 with SMTP id hb15-20020a170907160f00b0072f1442ed54mr12119573ejc.339.1659360261725; Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krava ([193.85.244.190]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lb17-20020a170907785100b0072ae174cdd4sm1870689ejc.111.2022.08.01.06.24.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 Aug 2022 06:24:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Jiri Olsa X-Google-Original-From: Jiri Olsa Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2022 15:24:18 +0200 To: Jiri Olsa , Stephane Eranian Cc: =?utf-8?B?6LCt5qKT54WK?= , Zixuan Tan , terrelln@fb.com, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf build: Suppress openssl v3 deprecation warnings in libcrypto feature test Message-ID: References: <20220625153439.513559-1-tanzixuan.me@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:16:06AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:08:34AM +0800, 谭梓煊 wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 10:45 PM Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 11:34:38PM +0800, Zixuan Tan wrote: > > > > With OpenSSL v3 installed, the libcrypto feature check fails as it use the > > > > deprecated MD5_* API (and is compiled with -Werror). The error message is > > > > as follows. > > > > > > > > $ make tools/perf > > > > ``` > > > > Makefile.config:778: No libcrypto.h found, disables jitted code injection, > > > > please install openssl-devel or libssl-dev > > > > > > > > Auto-detecting system features: > > > > ... dwarf: [ on ] > > > > ... dwarf_getlocations: [ on ] > > > > ... glibc: [ on ] > > > > ... libbfd: [ on ] > > > > ... libbfd-buildid: [ on ] > > > > ... libcap: [ on ] > > > > ... libelf: [ on ] > > > > ... libnuma: [ on ] > > > > ... numa_num_possible_cpus: [ on ] > > > > ... libperl: [ on ] > > > > ... libpython: [ on ] > > > > ... libcrypto: [ OFF ] > > > > ... libunwind: [ on ] > > > > ... libdw-dwarf-unwind: [ on ] > > > > ... zlib: [ on ] > > > > ... lzma: [ on ] > > > > ... get_cpuid: [ on ] > > > > ... bpf: [ on ] > > > > ... libaio: [ on ] > > > > ... libzstd: [ on ] > > > > ... disassembler-four-args: [ on ] > > > > ``` > > > > > > > > This is very confusing because the suggested library (on my Ubuntu 20.04 > > > > it is libssl-dev) is already installed. As the test only checks for the > > > > presence of libcrypto, this commit suppresses the deprecation warning to > > > > allow the test to pass. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zixuan Tan > > > > --- > > > > tools/build/feature/test-libcrypto.c | 6 ++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/build/feature/test-libcrypto.c b/tools/build/feature/test-libcrypto.c > > > > index a98174e0569c..31afff093d0b 100644 > > > > --- a/tools/build/feature/test-libcrypto.c > > > > +++ b/tools/build/feature/test-libcrypto.c > > > > @@ -2,6 +2,12 @@ > > > > #include > > > > #include > > > > > > > > +/* > > > > + * The MD5_* API have been deprecated since OpenSSL 3.0, which causes the > > > > + * feature test to fail silently. This is a workaround. > > > > + */ > > > > > > then we use these deprecated MD5 calls in util/genelf.c if libcrypto is detected, > > > so I wonder how come the rest of the compilation passed for you.. do you have > > > CONFIG_JITDUMP disabled? > > > > > > thanks, > > > jirka > > > > > No, CONFIG_JITDUMP is not disabled. I am using the default configuration. > > > > Yes, you are right. The rest of the compilation should fail, but it doesn't. > > I checked the verbose build commands. This seems to be the result of another > > inconsistency. > > > > If libcrypto is detected, the macro "HAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT" will be > > defined, but in perf/util/genelf.c, "HAVE_LIBCRYPTO" without the "_SUPPORT" > > prefix is checked. This causes urandom always be used to create build id > > rather than MD5 and SHA1, no matter what the detection result is. > > > > In perf/Makefile.config, from line 776 > > ``` > > ifndef NO_LIBCRYPTO > > ifneq ($(feature-libcrypto), 1) > > msg := $(warning No libcrypto.h found, disables jitted code injection, > > please install openssl-devel or libssl-dev); > > NO_LIBCRYPTO := 1 > > else <-- if libcrypto feature detected > > CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBCRYPTO_SUPPORT <-- define this > > EXTLIBS += -lcrypto > > $(call detected,CONFIG_CRYPTO) > > endif > > endif > > ``` > > > > In perf/util/genelf.c, from line 33 > > ``` > > #ifdef HAVE_LIBCRYPTO <-- but check this, it's always false > > nice :) > > > > > #define BUILD_ID_MD5 > > #undef BUILD_ID_SHA /* does not seem to work well when linked with Java */ > > #undef BUILD_ID_URANDOM /* different uuid for each run */ > > > > #ifdef BUILD_ID_SHA > > #include > > #endif > > > > #ifdef BUILD_ID_MD5 > > #include > > #endif > > #endif <-- this block will be skipped > > ``` > > > > Maybe we should fix this, to really make use of libcrypto if it is available? > > yea, I think that was the original idea, let's keep the variable with > SUPPORT suffix and use the -Wdeprecated-declarations for genelf.c > > full fix would be to detect the new API and use it when it's available but.. > given that the check was false at least since 2016, perhaps we could remove > that code? ;-) Stephane? ping jirka