Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934888AbXFFTBc (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:01:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762361AbXFFTBZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:01:25 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.230]:18006 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763978AbXFFTBX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:01:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lIvegYKa9QokEWbz6V/XsKrm/rBa3nt8SGdO0wljZSUTaBzat98G0UfjtR3h3B1CZWxe12Q+lHvD3+wLCsf7CBg0dC9s/fIyimAVOUmZFNAxYDxLIc7TzDhDAxc5TRY0ul1u9PV+axzjmHatcY+qq05JkKmZ5/WM6eeFqKd0uMs= Message-ID: <6934efce0706061201o13709f3fu4aa12e6a40fe7e06@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 12:01:19 -0700 From: "Jared Hulbert" To: carsteno@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] cramfs: add cramfs Linear XIP Cc: "Nick Piggin" , "Andrew Morton" , richard.griffiths@windriver.com, "Richard Griffiths" , Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4666A319.1010901@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1179871779.24163.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070522154905.1d7e8a2e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4653F264.1030807@de.ibm.com> <465BB5BA.3050900@yahoo.com.au> <6934efce0706011748p46cf7995vdca0b9cc3f0b06a3@mail.gmail.com> <46612D6F.6000002@yahoo.com.au> <46641472.3080802@de.ibm.com> <6934efce0706060413y6e74512s19d5f468106d4b85@mail.gmail.com> <4666A319.1010901@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 896 Lines: 29 On 6/6/07, Carsten Otte wrote: > Jared Hulbert wrote: > > (2) failed with the following messages. (This wasn't really busybox. > > It was xxd, not statically link, hence the issue with ld.so) > Could you try to figure what happend to subject page before? Was it > subject to copy on write? With what flags has this vma been mmaped? > > thanks, > Carsten The vma->flags = 1875 = 0x753 This is: VM_READ VM_WRITE VM_MAYREAD VM_MAYEXEC VM_GROWSDOWN VM_GROWSUP VM_PFNMAP I assume no struct page exists for the pages of this file. When vm_no_page was called it seems it failed on a pte check since there is no backing page structure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/