Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220727210600.120221-1-logang@deltatee.com> <20220727210600.120221-2-logang@deltatee.com>
 <YuKZmloAcZWY5of8@infradead.org> <CAPhsuW4jtiuNPzC2aK-Jo80X15AWdYi7HQ2n7YWqVP6Uux3hYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <215E9FEF-69F9-44AB-A5B0-FD3C8335E985@deltatee.com>
In-Reply-To: <215E9FEF-69F9-44AB-A5B0-FD3C8335E985@deltatee.com>
From:   Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:49:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPhsuW4r2nz3Q62Q9CpouHmy2JNwgJZsn=ZHT3q82DE6ddhXtA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] md/raid5: Refactor raid5_get_active_stripe()
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@linux.dev>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@raithlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@eideticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@eideticom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 4:48 AM Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On July 29, 2022 7:48:48 PM ADT, Song Liu <song@kernel.org> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 7:13 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 03:05:56PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> >> > Refactor the raid5_get_active_stripe() to read more linearly in
> >> > the order it's typically executed.
> >> >
> >> > The init_stripe() call is called if a free stripe is found and the
> >> > function is exited early which removes a lot of if (sh) checks and
> >> > unindents the following code.
> >> >
> >> > Remove the while loop in favour of the 'goto retry' pattern, which
> >> > reduces indentation further. And use a 'goto wait_for_stripe' instead
> >> > of an additional indent seeing it is the unusual path and this makes
> >> > the code easier to read.
> >> >
> >> > No functional changes intended. Will make subsequent changes
> >> > in patches easier to understand.
> >>
> >> I find the new loop even more confusing than the old one.  I'd go
> >> with something like the version below (on top of the whol md-next tree
> >> that pulled this in way too fast..)
> >
> >This looks good to me. Christoph, would you mind send official patch
> >for this?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Song
>
> I'm on vacation this week, but I'd be happy to send patches addressing Christoph's feedback when I'm back next week.

We are in the merge window right now. So the timing is a little tricky. I will
try to send pull requests with this set as-is. Then we can do follow-ups.

Thanks,
Song