Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220726175043.1027731-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20220726175043.1027731-10-robdclark@gmail.com>
 <def8e47c-067e-0841-4ae4-1eb90244cd50@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <def8e47c-067e-0841-4ae4-1eb90244cd50@collabora.com>
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Aug 2022 13:00:27 -0700
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGtV4GY6=PmQh0wrKxjxk_baRCzOo=s=Uz-uKBNEn7SBBg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/15] drm/gem: Add LRU/shrinker helper
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:41 PM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/26/22 20:50, Rob Clark wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * drm_gem_lru_remove - remove object from whatever LRU it is in
> > + *
> > + * If the object is currently in any LRU, remove it.
> > + *
> > + * @obj: The GEM object to remove from current LRU
> > + */
> > +void
> > +drm_gem_lru_remove(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
> > +{
> > +     struct drm_gem_lru *lru = obj->lru;
> > +
> > +     if (!lru)
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     mutex_lock(lru->lock);
> > +     lru_remove(obj);
> > +     mutex_unlock(lru->lock);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_lru_remove);
>
> I made a preliminary port of the DRM-SHMEM shrinker on top of the the
> latest version of dma-buf locking convention and yours LRU patches. It
> all works good, the only thing that is missing for the DRM-SHMEM
> shrinker is the drm_gem_lru_remove_locked().
>
> What about to add a locked variant of drm_gem_lru_remove()?

Sounds fine to me.. the only reason it didn't exist yet was because it
wasn't needed yet..

I can respin w/ an addition of a _locked() version, or you can add it
on top in your patchset.  Either is fine by me

BR,
-R