Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <13d16a59-0b13-8484-380c-21deb864f0f2@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 09:16:02 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/resctrl: Support for AMD QoS new features
 and bug fix
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        reinette.chatre@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        bp@alien8.de
Cc:     eranian@google.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
        hpa@zytor.com, corbet@lwn.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
References: <165938717220.724959.10931629283087443782.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <165938717220.724959.10931629283087443782.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/2/22 03:55, Babu Moger wrote:
> v2:
>   a. Rebased the patches to latest stable tree (v5.18.15). Resolved some conflicts.
>   b. Added the patch to fix CBM issue on AMD. This was originally discussed
>      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220517001234.3137157-1-eranian@google.com/
> 

Shouldn't this series be rebased on tip tree? I think it's odd to base
new feature series on stable tree, since patches on the latter are mostly
bugfixes backported from mainline.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara