Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220802103643.v5.1.Ibf9efc9be50783eeee55befa2270b7d38552354c@changeid>
 <c4acb34f-7bba-336f-ddfc-a9c098f2c95f@acm.org> <CAONX=-cAW5UX__xu5y7NdtHkZq-YWmh_k=iFa5witdxw3xXkYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <d06d9625-8ef9-f385-a9c9-75c306a959ed@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <d06d9625-8ef9-f385-a9c9-75c306a959ed@acm.org>
From:   Daniil Lunev <dlunev@chromium.org>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 14:12:07 +1000
Message-ID: <CAONX=-fpMBSgMzdY9AnV3iJftv2+0UTiruMiR+Dt_dfwKEd6gA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ufs: core: print UFSHCD capabilities in controller's
 sysfs node
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        Keoseong Park <keosung.park@samsung.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
        Sohaib Mohamed <sohaib.amhmd@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

> Calling this the effective capabilities of the controller-device pair
> sounds good to me. But please do not refer to hba->caps. I'd like to
> rework hba->caps such that it only includes controller capabilities and
> no information related to the WriteBooster. Additionally, several UFS
> device capabilities that may be exported in the future are not
> represented in hba->caps.
So can you clarify where specifically do you want me to mention that?
Should I name the directory "effective_capabilities" or the commit
message?
Thanks,
--Daniil