Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:18:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:18:22 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:56337 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:18:11 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:18:00 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Morton , Larry McVoy , Daniel Phillips , Henning Schmiedehausen , Jeff Garzik , Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > > I'm very interested too, though I'll have to agree with Larry > > that Linux really isn't going anywhere in particular and seems > > to be making progress through sheer luck. > > Hey, that's not a bug, that's a FEATURE! Don't forget the fact that 2.4 is the first kernel you managed to get stable under high load since 1.2. Both 2.0 and 2.2 didn't get stable until Alan took over and Alan's 2.4 fork got stable some 4 months before your 2.4 tree got stable. I think you've pretty much proven how well random development works. regards, Rik -- Shortwave goes a long way: irc.starchat.net #swl http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/