Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Sender: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 11:39:28 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc:     Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
        reinette.chatre@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        bp@alien8.de, eranian@google.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
        x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, corbet@lwn.net,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] x86/resctrl: Support for AMD QoS new features
 and bug fix
Message-ID: <Yujw0FOMj3tS0f3k@gmail.com>
References: <165938717220.724959.10931629283087443782.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu>
 <13d16a59-0b13-8484-380c-21deb864f0f2@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <13d16a59-0b13-8484-380c-21deb864f0f2@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


* Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 8/2/22 03:55, Babu Moger wrote:
> > v2:
> >   a. Rebased the patches to latest stable tree (v5.18.15). Resolved some conflicts.
> >   b. Added the patch to fix CBM issue on AMD. This was originally discussed
> >      https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220517001234.3137157-1-eranian@google.com/
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't this series be rebased on tip tree? I think it's odd to base 
> new feature series on stable tree, since patches on the latter are mostly 
> bugfixes backported from mainline.

Normally that's true, but AFAICS the patchset applies cleanly to latest 
-tip as well, so 'stable == tip' in this regard.

Series looks good to me (without having tested it):

  Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

	Ingo