Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 2 Aug 2022 20:26:57 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To:     Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
Cc:     daniel@ffwll.ch, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
        airlied@linux.ie, tzimmermann@suse.de, mripard@kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH drm-misc-next v7 0/5] drm: rename CMA helpers to DMA
 helpers
Message-ID: <YulscTGLXzsbar4v@ravnborg.org>
References: <20220802000405.949236-1-dakr@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220802000405.949236-1-dakr@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Danilo,

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 02:04:00AM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> This patch series renames all CMA helpers to DMA helpers - considering the
> hierarchy of APIs (mm/cma -> dma -> gem/fb dma helpers) calling them DMA
> helpers seems to be more applicable.
> 
> Additionally, commit e57924d4ae80 ("drm/doc: Task to rename CMA helpers")
> requests to rename the CMA helpers and implies that people seem to be confused
> about the naming.
> 
> The patches are compile-time tested building a x86_64 kernel with
> `make allyesconfig && make drivers/gpu/drm`.

For good measure I build tested each patch on my setup - which covers a
few more archs (cross compiled).
There was a few checkpatch warnings when applying, which I happily ignored.
Most/all are existing flaws where you do other edits in the relevant
line.

I consider the series ready to be applied to drm-misc, but have not done
so myself.
I have pinged Daniel Vetter on irc - as he was the one suggesting the
task from the very beginning.

	Sam