Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:56:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:55:56 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:60350 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:55:44 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:55:43 -0700 Message-Id: <200112021755.fB2Hthl10340@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alexander Viro Cc: Pierre Rousselet , Marcelo Tosatti , Keith Owens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.1-pre5 not easy to boot with devfs In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <3C0A025C.88B7A2C3@wanadoo.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro writes: > > > On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Pierre Rousselet wrote: > > > Here is the final (i hope) verdict of my devfs testbox : > > > > 2.4.16 with devfsd-1.3.18/1.3.20 : OK > > 2.4.17-pre1 " : Broken > > 2.5.1-pre1 " : OK > > 2.5.1-pre2 with or without v200 : Broken > > 2.5.1-pre5 " : Broken > > IOW, merge of new devfs code (2.4.17-pre1 in -STABLE, 2.5.1-pre2 in -CURRENT). > > We really need CONFIG_DEBUG_* forced if CONFIG_DEVFS_FS is set. Otherwise > we'll be getting tons of bug reports due to silent memory corruption. > > Keith, is there a decent way to do that? For 2.4.17 it would help a > lot... Is that worth the effort? Hopefully by 2.4.17-rc I'll have fixed the bug, so it won't be an issue. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/