Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 13:03:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 13:03:06 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:62398 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 13:02:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 11:02:44 -0700 Message-Id: <200112021802.fB2I2iE10476@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alan Cox Cc: viro@math.psu.edu (Alexander Viro), pierre.rousselet@wanadoo.fr (Pierre Rousselet), marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti), kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.1-pre5 not easy to boot with devfs In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox writes: > > > Here is the final (i hope) verdict of my devfs testbox : > > > > > > 2.4.16 with devfsd-1.3.18/1.3.20 : OK > > > 2.4.17-pre1 " : Broken > > > 2.5.1-pre1 " : OK > > Sounds like the new devfs code should be backed out of 2.4 until > fixed in 2.5 Hey! It's a pre-patch. There's time before 2.4.17-rc is released. Having it in a pre-patch is the only way to get decent testing, unfortunately. Not enough people bother downloading extra patches. All known issues were resolved before the merge. And 2.5 isn't going to get a lot of testing until the breakage caused by the bio changes is fixed. At the moment, I can't even test it myself. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/