Received: by 2002:ac0:e350:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g16csp325954imn; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 05:35:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6BJau4X1Ao3GT7zgQ0Bo9C3DUZw6QvRQc9lYrA72AQFCV99LVcLM/2tXww1eA4YiDaXug0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:181f:b0:52d:87ef:f9bb with SMTP id y31-20020a056a00181f00b0052d87eff9bbmr13695614pfa.70.1659530114891; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:35:14 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659530114; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r0puW8rbpKorVnWN3h6xHo1wIDQ9qSXIpx9NoXZ34N/PCvNlHK/50q5c4lYEyN13Tr mWARFQMNLoD5OSd5baF+KPApxpqh8nW594HNrCNTZ0mbfWOlWXyHVPaW3ylV+ZvmxPkW 4FEgqWP0fiAbT2UbUhvpoxg8j4BaxLCaj3smrZ07gZ/wqoviefysisefmTRy2v0XAwvv ZZIughOkqEeMMldlQ9dqbrjwAt3OxseHydXv0fcuZk/3HJlgD0yLbpeHV799/hnxT/qY Zd1XLUvqlcpDlPpUz8CwksKGkbSgWkVq+BLqQhXD0W20/kyXiesHhb59WWcN06brSAM3 Wk8w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=f4+WSlSASedqAzSB/RrEBEgyBnDRD5c9baFum/j+XEo=; b=tTn0mby3TFKINS1rFBPnQGn4C7kNeO5TUuOIzrXFeWDz8A9Z2hR1w+G3wSFNzLSBSc wvxcORepo7uQUWoZ8Yelb6CGNhZd04DrM9YJh31RTeJFfnG/D1iYHivif12pKAGf+AdK FTI83EyYtOgDwNf5RzCLLHjSEwFoynDzrTZpfgYTOrR2M5Dy9caLdvgQfNU1Jd95gVJD 98lWgRpWYSqaWlocJ6PggcwMyMk2JcP8VoIdIm3bxSW+w4T7fPpyefCNy/o1exdlPmU6 Gz+LNT/1w2C5I8AS4VONEJRNh0FQ+M8AVQ9/TcezmkD2w9GteW1z1Abn/uHLmcux2i/m i2Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=yiXwglll; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f1-20020a655901000000b0041b2f37c570si19296996pgu.752.2022.08.03.05.34.57; Wed, 03 Aug 2022 05:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=yiXwglll; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238025AbiHCMaa (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:30:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37634 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236240AbiHCMa1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2022 08:30:27 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DFE13D5B for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 05:30:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1BB0B82253 for ; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 150BAC433D7; Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:30:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1659529823; bh=AdWGEbEZ/lHN4pPwof4wLKR8WEKA97IaNOAPBYS/GlI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=yiXwglll6oq4AkdBbgjwkGXVe6yWG5W5gdQ/DhFOp33KiMaXWPUeo0ouT0wzD7TIi KL9pvpGVcfxacojNgwaa5trRNMb9yb5L3YI6To1HW0M+1sH2VpqXK3OnLVfzNhGtBs zTyMHRvewVQvf6DV5ibivHNUsHsISx75JRcfapJs= Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2022 14:30:21 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Alex Elder Cc: cgel.zte@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, ye xingchen , Zeal Robot Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] Re: [PATCH linux-next] staging: greybus:using the Message-ID: References: <20220803062258.1650792-1-ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn> <81d363ba-82ef-d556-2d77-083e3b2d9d02@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <81d363ba-82ef-d556-2d77-083e3b2d9d02@linaro.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 07:00:21AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > On 8/3/22 1:30 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 06:22:58AM +0000, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote: > > > From: ye xingchen > > > > > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to instade of pm_runtime_get_sync > > > and pm_runtime_put_noidle. > > > > > > Reported-by: Zeal Robot > > > Signed-off-by: > > > --- > > > drivers/greybus/core.c | 3 +-- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/greybus/core.c b/drivers/greybus/core.c > > > index e546c6431877..b9063e86534b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/greybus/core.c > > > +++ b/drivers/greybus/core.c > > > @@ -174,9 +174,8 @@ static int greybus_probe(struct device *dev) > > > if (!id) > > > return -ENODEV; > > > - retval = pm_runtime_get_sync(&bundle->intf->dev); > > > + retval = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&bundle->intf->dev); > > > if (retval < 0) { > > > - pm_runtime_put_noidle(&bundle->intf->dev); > > > return retval; > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > > > > Now this is just being silly. Consider all future emails also dropped. > > > No Greg, please don't do this, or please undo this. > > This happened because the original poster was not a subscriber to the > greybus-dev mailing list. Such messages get held until someone (me) > releases them after picking them out from the mostly spam that is > caught and held. I have been trying to do that daily lately but > it's still not enough to avoid this happening. > > You were on the original addressee list. So you got the message > immediately. But the mailing list filter held it and sent it > again when I released it yesterday. This is why you saw it the > second time. > > Ye Xingchen had nothing to do with your receiving the message twice. Ah, ok. But they did send a number of patches like this while after I had sent my first request to not do patches in this format anymore, which is what caused my response here. thanks, greg k-h