Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 16:35:42 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 5.20
Message-ID: <YuqHvu4zAzwq+BdZ@linutronix.de>
References: <YufsTLpighCI7qSf@alley>
 <CAHk-=wie+VC-R5=Hm=Vrg5PLrJxb1XiV67Efx-9Cr1fBKCWHTQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wie+VC-R5=Hm=Vrg5PLrJxb1XiV67Efx-9Cr1fBKCWHTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On 2022-08-02 20:19:34 [-0700], Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Seriously, even if you have strict RT requirements, you may also have
> strict debugging requirements, and if something goes wrong, you want
> to KNOW ABOUT IT. At that point, your RT rules may well fly out the
> window, because you have more serious problems.
> 
> End result: no way will I accept this kind of completely arbitrary and
> frankly not very intelligent patch.
> 
> If people want to disable console printing, that's THEIR CHOICE. It
> could be a new config variable where you ASK people about what they
> want. Not this kind of idiotic tying together of things.

I don't argue about the loss in debugging with disabled consoles and I
spare you the time explaining how it got there.

Petr, do you revert it yourself or do you want me to send a revert?

>                Linus

Sebastian