Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Wed, 3 Aug 2022 12:06:57 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] printk for 5.20
Message-ID: <20220803120657.03f35595@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <YuqXkCZEfsSKoIX6@alley>
References: <YufsTLpighCI7qSf@alley>
        <CAHk-=wie+VC-R5=Hm=Vrg5PLrJxb1XiV67Efx-9Cr1fBKCWHTQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <YuqXkCZEfsSKoIX6@alley>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 17:43:12 +0200
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:

> On the positive side. My intuition told me that it was very controversial.
> This is why I clearly described the effect. And it was the very first
> sentence in the commit message. I think that I made it _very visible_.

Right. I do not see you doing anything to lose Linus's trust. You stated
upfront exactly what it was doing. And let Linus decide if it was right or
not. Maybe it was a misjudgment on your part. But chalk it up as a learning
experience. I personally find you a good maintainer.

-- Steve