Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 00:24:08 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git pile 3 - dcache
Message-ID: <YusDmF39ykDmfSkF@casper.infradead.org>
References: <YurA3aSb4GRr4wlW@ZenIV>
 <CAHk-=wizUgMbZKnOjvyeZT5E+WZM0sV+zS5Qxt84wp=BsRk3eQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YuruqoGHJONpdZcK@home.goodmis.org>
 <CAHk-=whJvgykcTnR+BMJNwd+me5wvg+CxjSBeiPYTR1B2g5NpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20220803185936.228dc690@gandalf.local.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220803185936.228dc690@gandalf.local.home>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 15:09:23 -0700
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Admittedly I think "preempt_enable_under_spinlock()" may be a bit
> > *too* cumbersome as a name. It does explain what is going on - and
> > both the implementation and the use end up being fairly clear (and the
> > non-RT case could have some debug version that actually tests that
> > preemption has already been disabled).
> 
> 	preempt_disable_inlock() ?

preempt_disable_locked()?