Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758076AbXFGHPf (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:15:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753036AbXFGHP1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:15:27 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]:28868 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751676AbXFGHP0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:15:26 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KbGZFII0silOtNA3LCr/Wb1RAZN6REJnWA9anh3ZTsfGvq6yBF/qpV2lAatEurO1Te/NABj5sB+0X9063GDPuy0r+7O6DDD92GeJ34BMaVZ7aidv0dsn4rs+HSCuOQGqNyVXvEGQSIltU4srW2XRhh2MNz1fiI//e2JoMWqfLWw= Message-ID: <4667B095.5050508@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:15:33 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Andrew Morton , Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 References: <200706061421.l56ELDfB004305@harpo.it.uu.se> <4666D3F8.4010002@gmail.com> <20070606105650.bebf1c95.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4666FBE8.3030103@gmail.com> <4667A93A.4060608@gmail.com> <4667AD3F.1010405@gmail.com> <4667AF20.4020209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4667AF20.4020209@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1436 Lines: 35 Tejun Heo napsal(a): > Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Yes. Now I'm compiling -rc4-mm2. > > It's probably caused by new sysfs slimdown patches and I'm pretty sure > -rc4-mm2 would fail the same way. The offending one should be one of > the following patches. There's reverted gregkh-driver-block-device in -mm2. So I wanted to give it a try. Do you think it's pointless and that patch has no impact on the behaviour? > gregkh-driver-sysfs-fix-parent-refcounting-during-rename-and-move.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-reorganize-sysfs_new_indoe-and-sysfs_create.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-iget_locked-instead-of-new_inode.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-fix-root-sysfs_dirent-root-dentry-association.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-move-s_active-functions-to-fs-sysfs-dirc.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-slim-down-sysfs_dirent-s_active.patch > gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-singly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree.patch > > Can you bisect the above patches? Sure, in 12 hours or tomorrow. thanks, -- http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint: B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/