Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759477AbXFGHXX (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:23:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751282AbXFGHXP (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:23:15 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]:38029 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbXFGHXO (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 03:23:14 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Aoy3ywkKHLZzVGD1QPuPNweQu6cNoj5ldvQ9w+85aVnnuf5pu9xfP2wR+KtyHtm6M/P1QzQ61NWCIMlHuuIVMTER55POQSG2mQrn3kJtYhwTSTTFm8JXQkhPAlX92K9zd8+5x+rfwEX1csUz9oS9/B6W2vI5sEApCFLVdZRi8Ho= Message-ID: <4667B241.801@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:22:41 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jiri Slaby CC: Andrew Morton , Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 References: <200706061421.l56ELDfB004305@harpo.it.uu.se> <4666D3F8.4010002@gmail.com> <20070606105650.bebf1c95.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4666FBE8.3030103@gmail.com> <4667A93A.4060608@gmail.com> <4667AD3F.1010405@gmail.com> <4667AF20.4020209@gmail.com> <4667B095.5050508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4667B095.5050508@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 829 Lines: 23 Jiri Slaby wrote: > Tejun Heo napsal(a): >> Jiri Slaby wrote: >>> Yes. Now I'm compiling -rc4-mm2. >> It's probably caused by new sysfs slimdown patches and I'm pretty sure >> -rc4-mm2 would fail the same way. The offending one should be one of >> the following patches. > > There's reverted gregkh-driver-block-device in -mm2. So I wanted to give it a > try. Do you think it's pointless and that patch has no impact on the behaviour? I'm not familiar with how lvm vgscan works and the patch does look like it can affect that. Please give a shot at -mm2. Thanks a lot. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/