Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPM=9twFEv8AcRQG-WXg5owy_Xhxy3DqnvVCFHgtd4TYCcKWEQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whXSt2N0GcoPC6XxXXLMpXm-34ua+X4AhPsLoqBcF6Xqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wj8UHvjsVPohpRA1RJo1upyKoSnjcsys+=vbRVbpPvBMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPM=9txsYE1zFDW+ehHQv138DoeT1Fw6hfzfPa4czvXGSjefjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wj+yzauNXiEwHfCrkbdLSQkizdR1Q3YJLAqPo6AVq2_4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPM=9txkjJg5uArn1ann7Hf+JFCukQFGwqv+YHAx97Cdxezs_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=whWcektQzPJgSPa2DC3wMPxgLh8fJVQWeo8i99XMXPjfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPM=9twUvRoVcWHhBH7yuDDVj8K8aM0APQ8Yx3cx19keLJP8Gg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wjbfAuN1eV+F0wWFsWEaMmJsT2p3DXnUvxo7bQ-xJwKCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHk-=wih3NEubvTye4URZOmLYu6G+ZT9cngepo0z++ogCWUymQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wih3NEubvTye4URZOmLYu6G+ZT9cngepo0z++ogCWUymQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 15:25:35 +1000
Message-ID: <CAPM=9twRb4c62e0mU9CwOTAYMkR6YCRR5=KLTrSKoLbJ7RB9xw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm for 5.20/6.0
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>,
        Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>,
        Harry Wentland <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 14:46, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:27 PM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > I'll do a few more. It's close enough already that it should be just
> > four more reboots to pinpoint exactly which commit breaks.
>
> commit 5d945cbcd4b16a29d6470a80dfb19738f9a4319f is the first bad commit.
>
> I think it's supposed to make no semantic changes, but it clearly does.
>
> What a pain to figure out what's wrong in there, and I assume it
> doesn't revert cleanly either.
>
> Bringing in the guilty parties. See
>
>   https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wj+yzauNXiEwHfCrkbdLSQkizdR1Q3YJLAqPo6AVq2_4Q@mail.gmail.com/
>
> for the beginning of this thread.

I think I've tracked it down, looks like it would only affect GFX8
cards, which might explain why you and I have seen it, and I haven't
seen any other reports.

pretty sure you have an rx580, and I just happen to have a fiji card
in this machine right now.

I'll retest on master and send you a fixup patch.

Dave.