Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <1d6b475b-412d-da94-8505-0fd6f8f6a2c9@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 09:25:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pmic: add mt6366 regulator document
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?WmhpeW9uZyBUYW8gKOmZtuW/l+WLhyk=?= 
        <Zhiyong.Tao@mediatek.com>,
        "lee.jones@linaro.org" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        "lgirdwood@gmail.com" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        "broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>,
        =?UTF-8?B?RWRkaWUgSHVhbmcgKOm7g+aZuuWCkSk=?= 
        <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
        "a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        "alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        "fshao@chromium.org" <fshao@chromium.org>
Cc:     =?UTF-8?B?U2VuIENodSAo5YKo5qOuKQ==?= <Sen.Chu@mediatek.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?SHVpIExpdSAo5YiY6L6JKQ==?= <Hui.Liu@mediatek.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?QWxsZW4tS0ggQ2hlbmcgKOeoi+WGoOWLsyk=?= 
        <Allen-KH.Cheng@mediatek.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?SHNpbi1Ic2l1bmcgV2FuZyAo546L5L+h6ZuEKQ==?= 
        <Hsin-Hsiung.Wang@mediatek.com>,
        Sean Wang <Sean.Wang@mediatek.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?TWFjcGF1bCBMaW4gKOael+aZuuaWjCk=?= 
        <Macpaul.Lin@mediatek.com>,
        =?UTF-8?B?V2VuIFN1ICjomIflhqDmlocp?= <Wen.Su@mediatek.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group 
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
        zhiyong tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatk.com>
References: <20220728062749.18701-1-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
 <20220728062749.18701-2-zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
 <03a13ed4-e7cd-6f7d-f8f7-9b1e6193e202@linaro.org>
 <3d97d4c46467909739b8b69662412fe162dbe613.camel@mediatek.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <3d97d4c46467909739b8b69662412fe162dbe613.camel@mediatek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 03/08/2022 11:50, Rex-BC Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-07-28 at 18:46 +0800, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/07/2022 08:27, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
>>> From: zhiyong tao <zhiyong.tao@mediatek.com>
>>>
>>> Add mt6366 regulator document
>>
>> As usual with Mediatek your emails fail to properly pass modern SMTP
>> checks and you end up in spam.
>>
>> I reported it months ago to folks in Mediatek. No improvements since
>> that time.
>>
>> I stopped checking my spam folder for Mediatek stuff and all will be
>> ignored. I will also stop complaining about it - just ignore
>> Mediatek.
>>
>> Fix your systems, instead of putting additional effort on community
>> and
>> on reviewers.
>>
> 
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> I am Rex from MediaTek chrome project team.
> We noticed your complain of our upstream mail.
> 
> First of all, sorry for the inconvenience.
> We really want to fix this SPAM issue.
> 
> From our side, we can make sure mails for kernel upstream from MediaTek
> is clear and these mails pass the verification of DMARC/DKIM/SPF.
> Therefore, to identify the root cause, could you please provide us some
> mails that seen as SPAM from MediaTek?
> It's more useful if you can use the form of attachment. In that case,
> we can analyze whole mails including mail headers.
> 
> We really appreciate your big support, and we hope we can fix this
> issue to reduce the inconvenience for reviewing series from MediaTek.
> If you can spare some time to help us for this, it would very helpful!!
> 
> Our IT also adjust the DKIM setting today. If the situation of this
> issue it much better, please also let us know.
> 

Hi,

Since few days there were no @mediatek.com emails in my spam folder,
either because nothing was sent to me, or they passed spam filters.

If this is the result of some changes, then it seems working. Thank you.

I'll let you now when I find something new in the spam.

Best regards,
Krzysztof