Received: by 2002:ac0:e350:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g16csp233624imn; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:57:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5et4nRjvLNLITB37Y59ipp1OfwzuuCyWMMRwdrXx+I8k2Xr4nC5rNuk77qGdAq98TuFRRI X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:60c7:b0:72b:5651:e1f8 with SMTP id hv7-20020a17090760c700b0072b5651e1f8mr938116ejc.375.1659610649598; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:57:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659610649; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=eK3VPPgg695EYzQXZKbliqvxlozrz/g9sRGlgtRxfDSEwzFBBAwH77ADIiXOOLj1R0 XjhXdn3G974A9yEkV4E3kTYQXbehlt+43oO5N2MFLEe7TosneJ/28COpCcveV0fj1x9C h5I1yP1cRECljrcDp3/2IFXxm4d1hS2FwBbEqB78kguYQ0TJmK/kosUTc+O3mwi8jKNk w9whZtD9epcnUpkoZICbWHhkLYralZsbkGG3qlUglrT3uNaxFIEOOYC6VZtNe7M4+hyd B66nbj3+Oliz3xE/OnAeoyRUtz7kG2xMhyk/WKiKCpD9U3lrlvmOHsTKNaBPdcPABUVb gx+A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+BgJE+VutUW89pHDR76Q7GZVqJGhoIuZ6Urr0HFMgdA=; b=kT93mDmZqPmRX0teWwxGu57Neh+E+pv0YKC3P1g6N53tpxELF8tw6c6BM0mOFg55Mu BpO7ZFGG6nOg8JuYzxFi13aw9cEEcdANRbCK1EXKAMdZDSOWUgogtSm4QdutQIq7hreh JSyORVOXHpDayemQaCkyEF1MHSzBz1E2DxB2xxQaXKHhAFvbNAjDM6wJ7hZ+tAZfziaD k2DoVNgfm8X7Lpc3OfTTNC7XVBQlLkD6SV32ajB9QflM4DIMh5nQw5rMB/DhrK7X0Rux qqjWNieyewvveNX3IMat9AFDcYVkEETWU7wq7r4JBy4dVEl5Im4t7E5ZgZU14ajO9CwW 9wXQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v18-20020a056402349200b0043ec4510a05si254830edc.587.2022.08.04.03.57.01; Thu, 04 Aug 2022 03:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238145AbiHDKwe (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 06:52:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43890 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233486AbiHDKwb (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 06:52:31 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F6649B4D; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 03:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69190B824E4; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 10:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F164C433D7; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 10:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2022 06:52:23 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Al Viro , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs.git pile 3 - dcache Message-ID: <20220804065223.209ac060@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20220803185936.228dc690@gandalf.local.home> <20220803213255.3ab719e3@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Aug 2022 19:16:12 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > I wonder if raw_preempt_disable() would be another name to use? > > NO! > > The point is that normal non-RT code does *not* disable preemption at > all, because it is already disabled thanks to the earlier spinlock. > > So we definitely do *not* want to call this "raw_preempt_disable()", > because it's actually not supposed to normally disable anything at > all. Only for RT, where the spinlock code doesn't do it. Yeah, I'm just brainstorming ideas on what we could use to make that name a little shorter, and I'm not coming up with much. OK, I'm becoming colorblind with this shed. -- Steve