Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220804103456.3176943-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220804103456.3176943-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org>
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 4 Aug 2022 17:37:48 +0300
Message-ID: <CAA8EJpoYrXNBeZfDTAmjhsHaMqO+jeUVt4BtQkKy=T7Q0EuH8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] clk: qcom: common: Detach the power domain at the end of probe
To:     Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
        Mike Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 13:35, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> None of the CCs actually need the PD attached to their device,
> but rather some GDSCs registered by those CCs need that PD as a parent
> in order to propagate power gating and the performance state.
>
> So lets detach the PD from the CC right at the end of probe, after
> everything has been successfully set up.

Would it still be possible to read the clock registers if we detach
the device from the domain?
I think it was the original issue behind putting the dispcc/videocc
into the MMCX domain: to be able to poke into the clock registers,
which are gated by the MMCX.


> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@linaro.org>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry