Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 5 Aug 2022 06:13:44 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Grzegorz Szymaszek <gszymaszek@short.pl>,
        Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com>,
        Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: r8188eu: set firmware path in a macro
Message-ID: <YuyY+N7W6/noGxDZ@kroah.com>
References: <YuoQ37PIKzWO1zIY@kroah.com>
 <6c83e05e5dbccff5630ccfed9e40bf84c889b647.1659565180.git.gszymaszek@short.pl>
 <c3b30433-7231-6ebb-b0ea-44e760c4af69@gmail.com>
 <YuxG0OImQ1i0EOFD@nx64de-df6d00>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <YuxG0OImQ1i0EOFD@nx64de-df6d00>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 12:23:12AM +0200, Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 10:11:58PM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
> > On 8/4/22 00:28, Grzegorz Szymaszek wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/os_intfs.c
> > > -%<-
> > > -MODULE_FIRMWARE("rtlwifi/rtl8188eufw.bin");
> > > +MODULE_FIRMWARE(FW_RTL8188EU);
> > 
> > 
> > It failed to apply your patch as the following line:
> > MODULE_FIRMWARE("rtlwifi/rtl8188eufw.bin");
> > is not in the repo. Inserted line in my repo to apply patch.
> 
> I’m sorry, I didn’t add the base tree reference. Right now, git
> format-patch generates the following:
> 
>     base-commit: 9de1f9c8ca5100a02a2e271bdbde36202e251b4b
>     prerequisite-patch-id: 79964bd0bcd260f1df53830a81e009c34993ee6f
> 
> The prerequisite patch is available at
> <https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YulcdKfhA8dPQ78s@nx64de-df6d00/>.
> 
> > Why is the coverletter missing?
> 
> I didn’t think it would be necessary, since the patches are quite
> simple and there are just three of them. Again, I’m sorry, I don’t want
> to make it harder for anyone to review my patches. Hopefully I will
> learn more of the kernel development practises without wasting too much
> time of patch reviewers.
> 
> Should I send an improved (with the base tree reference and with a short
> cover letter) patch series?

Nah, it's fine as-is, I will take it when my tree opens up again after
-rc1 is out in a week or so.

thanks,

greg k-h