Received: by 2002:a05:6358:e9c4:b0:b2:91dc:71ab with SMTP id hc4csp2133664rwb; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5fBFVGdWapHSTYHzWNVj+f2NGGCrNwllsELmTJR5AQqYCUcaYHeZgdAlEGD780iL6T2FC1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:240e:b0:1e0:775b:f8fc with SMTP id nr14-20020a17090b240e00b001e0775bf8fcmr9394241pjb.132.1659733362423; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659733362; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mbU5z9B8/y8wrtLsANQpowpZCJZdw1ai0MBg6pK6BhW89TVnZzWTw7D1/oUonV67MG L5hpLbQP2Y1yaif/YRecal3c36c33ENR7ce75qUK6hgyDC8k107XHE6ThWT3dNqFRymU sNmfNZh1z3GdIRJLXKRSSoEaRbN3d6p208VvxaSeJZCnKpgkBBPlwvHdNVQrP4UNEJjs NDY2fCdgH2UyZNBsvCvU98xUVOg1V+QFyXFGRi2ozmFDkwNx9d3jLSraZgYc5bWy47rP 4BUi/xabj0Jk+svquFmg/ureouT/7ciei/G+twOy6CFf3YJLBeI0PrrM9l43iI17PPib L4FA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=zr66uVxGpgt7UOEhQl6kTZ2TxRnFvwKd52pnY5jtykk=; b=cjAv8DcRVEoV7HXaG1rj9cyPwTqqXoo/dOUXeRR96Tnz+5ZlaFwXjp33UMTTF2x5RM 27p9qWmQQjf+LY96EPzYAsgHEd8HH2vXe0hiXaDNnJRaUrrqRyQ6e4eEvPn2JingB8aB YbDW79UdIYQA5wm4ioUkR3Qupiqt8NtR5EcBk84GMiAjGSSRMOSw965HMBvAlRxKtPmv uyb6o6LwiprmjCQ6fRrwouTbQbWnSoOJ90bMjH4z0WDO1xDNpfMe3WIYQrxv8y83tDju +IJcEzFt+2dx98ZiXj1ZN5NaqccGzrXpZOS2ToMK5uEAZaBcBTToBVFNnJNyf2RVAeR2 dXlA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t6-20020a17090a3e4600b001f20106f604si4756941pjm.142.2022.08.05.14.02.25; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 14:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234587AbiHEUzm (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:55:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35784 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S237544AbiHEUzg (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2022 16:55:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp07.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.129]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1125013E35 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2022 13:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop-os.home ([90.11.190.129]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id K4M1oAZJDoEdDK4M1o1VPQ; Fri, 05 Aug 2022 22:55:34 +0200 X-ME-Helo: pop-os.home X-ME-Auth: YWZlNiIxYWMyZDliZWIzOTcwYTEyYzlhMmU3ZiQ1M2U2MzfzZDfyZTMxZTBkMTYyNDBjNDJlZmQ3ZQ== X-ME-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2022 22:55:34 +0200 X-ME-IP: 90.11.190.129 From: Christophe JAILLET To: Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Robin Murphy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Christophe JAILLET , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH v2] perf/arm_pmu_platform: Fix an error message related to dev_err_probe() usage Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 22:55:30 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dev_err() is a macro that expand dev_fmt, but dev_err_probe() is a function and cannot perform this macro expansion. So hard code the "hw perfevents: " prefix and dd a comment explaining why. Fixes: 11fa1dc8020a ("perf/arm_pmu_platform: Use dev_err_probe() for IRQ errors") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET --- Untested, but I can't see how it could work. v1 --> v2 - fix a typo in the comment --- drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c index 513de1f54e2d..02cca4b8f0fd 100644 --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c @@ -101,8 +101,11 @@ static int pmu_parse_irqs(struct arm_pmu *pmu) struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; num_irqs = platform_irq_count(pdev); - if (num_irqs < 0) - return dev_err_probe(dev, num_irqs, "unable to count PMU IRQs\n"); + if (num_irqs < 0) { + /* dev_err_probe() does not handle dev_fmt, so hard-code the prefix */ + return dev_err_probe(dev, num_irqs, + "hw perfevents: unable to count PMU IRQs\n"); + } /* * In this case we have no idea which CPUs are covered by the PMU. -- 2.34.1