Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932579AbXFGPyb (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:54:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1765580AbXFGPyH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:54:07 -0400 Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.182]:38587 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765973AbXFGPyF (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:54:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=He56IWjtSp3U0Xbxi0ui/RWVfxyLprhL3ClFK2HRgmPhfuYoghcGVM5GNEBuYp0CYR5JDPWgyufwOtJbaDTBaHb0AEd3mvEkOCxm2jOM5ocV6uGhIz7Dzs1VNyf/joA94cEX2j5AIo0VJ1NQc5W3C3uv5kjGxT4s/A4Imu+Z2qg= Message-ID: <46682A25.5070409@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:54:13 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: Andrew Morton , Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 References: <200706061421.l56ELDfB004305@harpo.it.uu.se> <4666D3F8.4010002@gmail.com> <20070606105650.bebf1c95.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4666FBE8.3030103@gmail.com> <4667A93A.4060608@gmail.com> <4667AD3F.1010405@gmail.com> <4667AF20.4020209@gmail.com> <4667B095.5050508@gmail.com> <4667B241.801@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4667B241.801@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1165 Lines: 28 Tejun Heo napsal(a): > Jiri Slaby wrote: >> Tejun Heo napsal(a): >>> Jiri Slaby wrote: >>>> Yes. Now I'm compiling -rc4-mm2. >>> It's probably caused by new sysfs slimdown patches and I'm pretty sure >>> -rc4-mm2 would fail the same way. The offending one should be one of >>> the following patches. >> There's reverted gregkh-driver-block-device in -mm2. So I wanted to give it a >> try. Do you think it's pointless and that patch has no impact on the behaviour? > > I'm not familiar with how lvm vgscan works and the patch does look like > it can affect that. Please give a shot at -mm2. Yup, it works without any further patches. So it seems like gregkh-driver-block-device is the culprit? regards, -- http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint: B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/