Received: by 2002:a05:6358:e9c4:b0:b2:91dc:71ab with SMTP id hc4csp2770572rwb; Sat, 6 Aug 2022 06:00:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR60vVlnrRVQfEVmZEXshiHh0Daaa8EiYUSVzNmYZCsyVOKeTCTWzbTnBKVi2Zr+xQxQftK2 X-Received: by 2002:a63:8848:0:b0:41c:45da:2db9 with SMTP id l69-20020a638848000000b0041c45da2db9mr9030843pgd.206.1659790841438; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 06:00:41 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659790841; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c8l49rQINaM0oYPJCSh2hXmGQ5toolwvbGYx/n/80790UVImoEdMrpYmhfP4cYP4x6 zOAMC32yFfiIv0MF4lPf5A6eOe4F7M371sxog3EJYlraOQWDAbKud+era9mAx09EI74R DLJIncFYE5TMYH6BJZJzyPYCMYonNaZHwuQ4LzRKkf/XSu2tCyqFR4001bgOHAZad/2H yC3dilbJFaw2puwXrx3xiOKr0ZxBn7YB+3TiK7AJ4RVlK6gQvOPjiGYyi5fUfmUadUcU rtQGbmZ8DEFODsEHrIQiMl2xAGf5EUth8e9QvQ1jCKFpNniZmb/W3j2UDWdxazSJPS9H xlTA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=wfqUsEzEiCCBgQ5jNGeT7/KH0IY7yOeXOJ/dkTqWA2E=; b=AqYclrGkq1AbhJ8pDBRdE+RW2fEDv1ZSDOSDOJcHUocYidHEOwOtkNKX0yDO+tXzqm f2RsAa42joxeCFp2CSFVMuzEfWs2NGZITIfClT0pugpJmOakD6ogGz4kASHEf6+CAGvl O1Er/VNI74OonOoIoGGt2tvTrpxAKM7ZcM7sUg1fD7fBrdGne7e955gEhvLi9vSsq4Nr x6rf2y3wzQIlhKOO42D/CgdTmUKI7Sjlq1kNcreom0WmmGofyZKX4KqmgYpjuj2r6IB+ Gh5XihOtb8fW7ARFBouAGjq2V78bOLleT/kp+5WK/0ldgWqGafijuNFCZlOpj+hZWCHA hDOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kylehuey.com header.s=google header.b=XUzM0spO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 8-20020a17090a0f8800b001f2cf977479si9959281pjz.116.2022.08.06.06.00.26; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 06:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kylehuey.com header.s=google header.b=XUzM0spO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231283AbiHFMqq (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 6 Aug 2022 08:46:46 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56840 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230192AbiHFMqp (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Aug 2022 08:46:45 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0233411A2D for ; Sat, 6 Aug 2022 05:46:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id g5so7417702ybg.11 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 05:46:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kylehuey.com; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=wfqUsEzEiCCBgQ5jNGeT7/KH0IY7yOeXOJ/dkTqWA2E=; b=XUzM0spOXwRLkQOziA2UxUAINcsO0ir6CtCUIe6xr++pqfWJn8GnXtG6SI1PcVC7+e S5NZfq/F6tgWrkzRSBaAXW6FMWk/Ks42dDiabekOY3evqB1IbYsq3yDgijLZYEg79p+J M9P4qGNDnT5wBts4YFs3ZYPXRrV8XJ4xORgxfhfPrMNY0mvePF61jh6ab/3vsSw92neZ IE3cdgDq3NEZf4PM3qOxTy9DW1WtzhE7AuoY8F1pqJAvyplWARP7IsslQql19eUQP4e/ fXoSqpnJKKQ3x7wjg33HwV0UbmNWY9WXBE/sj+1cGai4czrGd980h+H0h6t/Zdsebap3 1jhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=wfqUsEzEiCCBgQ5jNGeT7/KH0IY7yOeXOJ/dkTqWA2E=; b=xEKFE75119hk8K1ZD/64uV6Z5VunYnvDlOamDiBpg8rmhOHO5LwxLo7vM9QCqqGwti p9wvbV+1eEjfTK180CETY8lM9p0XVcL4EjaqZYOwejZXw56nAsZV2fNMHJwK5igIdDJF 3PQXBkg1JhaJeBAa2Vd2yEET9KtqMx4k+3ZYtGrvTfit8xOQgxFmCrouO3Q4dQovGkXi DjH8CxfUe727vHY/ESWRiLwzjzXsXMaKZLB46gw7KPAoOHJ8M26ZeceahhjwNP+VVlW/ 7B+qSjDe6lFJppPyKjEzJpWoM2rFbxt4RDvxz8YT7HqzWLABVQl1++Q/RXgZJ0evYG3/ flwA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo1QUO0hGGrT4MoPM+7VqcPzdEZnac7pHaPGGpi/v32I7Zw9aypN jrXvJYWLXqylalVZAvdOdiMO2EAlqX0vzUlSZqNX/O5QpkWCuA== X-Received: by 2002:a25:6ed5:0:b0:669:8b84:bb57 with SMTP id j204-20020a256ed5000000b006698b84bb57mr8511440ybc.227.1659790003139; Sat, 06 Aug 2022 05:46:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220805230158.39378-1-khuey@kylehuey.com> <20220805230158.39378-2-khuey@kylehuey.com> In-Reply-To: From: Kyle Huey Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2022 05:46:31 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] selftests/vm/pkeys: Add a regression test for setting PKRU through ptrace To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "Robert O'Callahan" , David Manouchehri Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 1:52 AM Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Kyle Huey wrote: > > > From: Kyle Huey > > > > This tests PTRACE_SETREGSET with NT_X86_XSTATE modifying PKRU directly and > > removing the PKRU bit from XSTATE_BV. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kyle Huey > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h | 12 +++ > > tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++- > > 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h > > index b078ce9c6d2a..72c14cd3ddc7 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-x86.h > > @@ -104,6 +104,18 @@ static inline int cpu_has_pkeys(void) > > return 1; > > } > > > > +static inline int cpu_max_xsave_size(void) > > +{ > > + unsigned long XSTATE_CPUID = 0xd; > > + unsigned int eax; > > + unsigned int ebx; > > + unsigned int ecx; > > + unsigned int edx; > > + > > + __cpuid_count(XSTATE_CPUID, 0, eax, ebx, ecx, edx); > > + return ecx; > > +} > > + > > static inline u32 pkey_bit_position(int pkey) > > { > > return pkey * PKEY_BITS_PER_PKEY; > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c > > index 291bc1e07842..27759d3ed9cd 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c > > @@ -18,12 +18,13 @@ > > * do a plain mprotect() to a mprotect_pkey() area and make sure the pkey sticks > > * > > * Compile like this: > > - * gcc -o protection_keys -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm > > - * gcc -m32 -o protection_keys_32 -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm > > + * gcc -mxsave -o protection_keys -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm > > + * gcc -mxsave -m32 -o protection_keys_32 -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -pthread -Wall protection_keys.c -lrt -ldl -lm > > */ > > #define _GNU_SOURCE > > #define __SANE_USERSPACE_TYPES__ > > #include > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > @@ -1550,6 +1551,86 @@ void test_implicit_mprotect_exec_only_memory(int *ptr, u16 pkey) > > do_not_expect_pkey_fault("plain read on recently PROT_EXEC area"); > > } > > > > +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__) > > +void test_ptrace_modifies_pkru(int *ptr, u16 pkey) > > +{ > > + pid_t child; > > + int status, ret; > > + int pkey_offset = pkey_reg_xstate_offset(); > > + size_t xsave_size = cpu_max_xsave_size(); > > + void *xsave; > > + u32 *pkey_register; > > + u64 *xstate_bv; > > + struct iovec iov; > > + > > + child = fork(); > > + pkey_assert(child >= 0); > > + dprintf3("[%d] fork() ret: %d\n", getpid(), child); > > + if (!child) { > > + u32 pkey_register = read_pkey_reg(); > > + > > + ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0); > > + raise(SIGSTOP); > > + > > + /* > > + * need __read_pkey_reg() version so we do not do shadow_pkey_reg > > + * checking > > + */ > > + if (pkey_register == __read_pkey_reg()) > > + exit(1); > > + > > + raise(SIGSTOP); > > + > > + exit(__read_pkey_reg()); > > + } > > + > > + pkey_assert(child == waitpid(child, &status, 0)); > > + dprintf3("[%d] waitpid(%d) status: %x\n", getpid(), child, status); > > + pkey_assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGSTOP); > > + > > + xsave = (void *)malloc(xsave_size); > > + pkey_assert(xsave > 0); > > + > > + iov.iov_base = xsave; > > + iov.iov_len = xsave_size; > > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov); > > + pkey_assert(ret == 0); > > + > > + pkey_register = (u32 *)(xsave + pkey_offset); > > + pkey_assert(*pkey_register == read_pkey_reg()); > > + > > + *pkey_register = !read_pkey_reg(); > > + > > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov); > > + pkey_assert(ret == 0); > > + > > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0); > > + pkey_assert(ret == 0); > > + > > + pkey_assert(child == waitpid(child, &status, 0)); > > + dprintf3("[%d] waitpid(%d) status: %x\n", getpid(), child, status); > > + pkey_assert(WIFSTOPPED(status) && WSTOPSIG(status) == SIGSTOP); > > + > > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov); > > + pkey_assert(ret == 0); > > + > > + xstate_bv = (u64 *)(xsave + 512); > > + *xstate_bv &= ~(1 << 9); > > + > > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_SETREGSET, child, (void *)NT_X86_XSTATE, &iov); > > + pkey_assert(ret == 0); > > + > > + ret = ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, child, 0, 0); > > + pkey_assert(ret == 0); > > + > > + pkey_assert(child == waitpid(child, &status, 0)); > > + dprintf3("[%d] waitpid(%d) status: %x\n", getpid(), child, status); > > + pkey_assert(WIFEXITED(status)); > > + pkey_assert(WEXITSTATUS(status) == 0); > > + free(xsave); > > LGTM. > > May I ask for a bit more in terms of testing the ABI: writing some > non-trivial (not all-zero and not all-ones) value into the PKRU register, > forcing the child task to go through a FPU save/restore context switch > and then reading it back and verifying the value, or something like that? Can you elaborate a bit on what you mean here? I'm not sure what "a FPU save/restore context switch" is. The XSTATE (and everything else) will be saved/restored at the ptrace stops (for the raise(SIGSTOP)s) already. - Kyle > Thanks, > > Ingo