Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 6 Aug 2022 16:14:58 +0300
From:   Konstantin Shelekhin <k.shelekhin@yadro.com>
To:     <ojeda@kernel.org>
CC:     <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
        <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
        <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <me@kloenk.de>, <milan@mdaverde.com>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
        <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        <wedsonaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 26/27] samples: add first Rust examples
Message-ID: <Yu5pUp5mfngAU7da@yadro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20220805154231.31257-27-ojeda@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

> +impl Drop for RustMinimal {
> +    fn drop(&mut self) {
> +        pr_info!("My numbers are {:?}\n", self.numbers);
> +        pr_info!("Rust minimal sample (exit)\n");
> +    }
> +}

I wonder if it would make more sense to implement exit() in
kernel::Module, just for the sake of uniformity.