Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Sat, 6 Aug 2022 15:08:27 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To:     Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Cc:     Kent Gustavsson <kent@minoris.se>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Improve MCP3911 driver
Message-ID: <20220806150827.1b28db62@jic23-huawei>
In-Reply-To: <YueEg0tmKpc4kdLO@gmail.com>
References: <20220722130726.7627-1-marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
        <20220731174112.072345e3@jic23-huawei>
        <YueEg0tmKpc4kdLO@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 1 Aug 2022 09:45:07 +0200
Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 05:41:12PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:07:17 +0200
> > Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This patch series intend to fix bugs and improve functionality of the
> > > MCP3911 driver.
> > > The main features added are
> > > - Support for buffers
> > > - Interrupt driven readings
> > > - Support for oversampling ratio
> > > - Support for set scale values (Gain)
> > > 
> > > Among the bug fixes, there are changes in the formula for calculate raw
> > > value and a fix for mismatch in the devicetree property.
> > > 
> > > Another general improvement for the driver is to use managed resources
> > > for all allocated resources.
> > >   
> > Hi Marcus,
> > 
> > The first 3 fixes look good to me.  Do you want me to pick those up to
> > go in after rc1 via my togreg-fixes branch?  The side effect of doing
> > that is it'll be a little while before they are upstream in the branch
> > I'll want to pick the rest of the series on top of.
> > 
> > So it's a trade off between getting fixes in as soon as possible and
> > slowing down other improvements a little.  
> 
> Both ways works for me.
> I guess it is preferable to get the fixes in as soon as possible?
> 
> If so, do you want me to rebase the series on your togreg-fixes branch
> or wait to send v5 until the patches are upstream?
> 
> Or simply keep sending the whole series?

For now resend the whole series. I don't want to pick anything up onto the fixes-togreg
branch until rc1 (as good time to get it to a more recent base).  So I'll sit on these
for another week anyway.

Thanks,


Jonathan

> 
> Thanks,
> Marcus Folkesson
> 
> > 
> > Jonathan
> >