Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu) by vger.rutgers.edu via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 05:20:05 -0400 Received: by vger.rutgers.edu id ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 05:19:48 -0400 Received: from enterprise.cistron.net ([195.64.68.33]:3101 "EHLO enterprise.cistron.net") by vger.rutgers.edu with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Aug 2000 05:18:00 -0400 From: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) Subject: Re: RLIM_INFINITY inconsistency between archs Date: 1 Aug 2000 09:38:33 GMT Organization: Cistron Internet Services B.V. Message-ID: <8m65qp$mpe$1@enterprise.cistron.net> References: <7iw6kYsXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <8m4q9v$871$1@enterprise.cistron.net> <20000731211119.A28169@thune.mrc-home.org> X-Trace: enterprise.cistron.net 965122713 23342 195.64.65.200 (1 Aug 2000 09:38:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu Content-Length: 795 Lines: 15 In article >20000731211119.A28169@thune.mrc-home.org>, Mike Castle wrote: >On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 09:15:43PM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: >> modules that use include/net ? The one in the kernel source is >> very, very different from the one in glibc .. so you have to compile >> with -I/path/to/kernel/include _anyway_ > >Maybe just make it mandatory that every time you upgrade the kernel, you >should rebuild the entire system. Well for modules, yes, that is pretty much the case isn't it ? Mike. -- Cistron Certified Internetwork Expert #1. Think free speech; drink free beer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/