Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:07:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:07:05 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:14611 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:06:47 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.4.17pre2: devfs: devfs_mk_dir(printers): could not append to dir: dffe45c0 "", err: -17 To: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca (Richard Gooch) Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:14:49 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@borntraeger.net (Christian =?iso-8859-1?q?Borntr=E4ger?=), acmay@acmay.homeip.net (andrew may), ajschrotenboer@lycosmail.com (Adam Schrotenboer), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200112022001.fB2K16Q12503@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> from "Richard Gooch" at Dec 02, 2001 01:01:06 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I wouldn't say it's not back compatible. If you want to use a new > devfsd feature, then you need the new devfs. The key difference > between the old and new devfs core (aside from fixing those races) is > that the new devfs core will spit out an EEXIST warning message > whereas before it didn't. But his system still worked. It didn't > break. Ok so the old devfsd works but spews a few errors. Right - then I agree with you. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/