Received: by 2002:a05:6358:e9c4:b0:b2:91dc:71ab with SMTP id hc4csp4300669rwb; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 20:48:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7VN7Cfbwxo/1te6EWHSVdLOMf4eYY8WJXStLEAcT5dnnKz1JPHKugzSIVTlF5k5WNqQi0N X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7ea0:b0:730:a4e8:27bc with SMTP id qb32-20020a1709077ea000b00730a4e827bcmr12815371ejc.166.1659930506490; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:48:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659930506; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n5dLXlorXhbbR6Q1isZX4tTDwkI1NWy7sbN89/N4naFkwAsJwYFZknRm6SSHTcHqQ+ dMEGUqGHRAff3GI6n/FQUC5mDo+9rQiXqczwIoUQcvdoM718Hk9vDY8Qi58Y7r8cMtEC F0SIsONtrbQGtsprZvjb0JazseeyUT26fq2K8JVvrpwW6XrIM++V/9TAjdCYXBO2pliX W0CiaXkd3bRDKgYJpLOQ1mwss8JwV6gHRjcZZtr4Oj03MX3mDQxHZqa0mK5q94PETJll DYJTV2VnI9J7yd/3PPMCPH4cvF/6enZTtPhD5BnzPrFqxIocJJHytFitFR5OhrgWjGty vsmw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+Kww/jD5guaEp+W9jKcexHZ7Wp7NW0FCz2ZGWvpJMWk=; b=t/JE+ILi0X0Ri5+ZqCsQdrYWBfzrDe9HQlJX6IpaXWQYIL2Z86jz0dAcVQNlv+Aiy0 cNwdvrCcA5PoAHRYr2mvYZo4yunHFRl3gQfVxf0Ka60yi5ZL/f2375CBtTlGGLazTpH9 VJXHDkaN18x9nJeug/E8FINaDzXXuTXSpsskO2Rdd7lXBQhVqopofWFhyG0RGMa6sKEb sZsACCknNqylRab2+7I2sIWw0/gPw1ZKDGXQjM+dq1f1KgetOgATCR9EB6ginfzsSJbu GeKndFCD1Rb+npZnNqUSao+SSO/H3fQZa2QVI4KOi7aXROpqzGjfWyA4IGZaAfZOsYgW jETg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dz11-20020a0564021d4b00b0043a72e1232asi6699391edb.324.2022.08.07.20.48.00; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 20:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235398AbiHHDgp (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 7 Aug 2022 23:36:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232427AbiHHDgn (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Aug 2022 23:36:43 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594715FAF for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 20:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 2783ahgC007586; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 05:36:43 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 05:36:43 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: "brookxu.cn@gmail.com" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Choose 5.10 LTS or 5.15 LTS Message-ID: <20220808033643.GB7325@1wt.eu> References: <61ecca29-2d01-af2d-3d18-62dad41c63b4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61ecca29-2d01-af2d-3d18-62dad41c63b4@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 10:35:19AM +0800, brookxu.cn@gmail.com wrote: > We want to choose an LTS kernel version to use for a few years. As we know, > the 5.10 LTS has a 6 years maintenance period with the help of huawei. But > the 5.15 LTS currently only has a two-year maintenance period, and it may > reach EOL next year. It is currently unclear whether it will be extended. It all depends on what level of effort you're willing to make: - if you really want to just use and not participate at all (i.e. report issues, test pre-releases etc), 5.10 will be more suited. - if you're willing to participate, you can start to encourage others to do so as well in order to convince Greg that he will not be alone in this tedious task and that it's worth extending 5.15. - or if you're willing to invest a little bit of time but don't want to engage too far, you could also take the risk of going for 5.15, hoping that it will be extended, knowing that if it's not, it will be your job to deal with backports (which usually is a real pain and would justify giving back some help on official support instead). > Coupled with the arrival of the 6.0 kernel, I am a little worried that the > maintenance of 5.15 will be reduced. Does anyone have good suggestions, > thank you. That's just numbering, and should in no way affect maintenance of existing code. Hoping this helps, Willy