Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <150988eef41cac1e1c4b422cf1ad65c10309f472.camel@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 3/8] drm/mediatek: Add MT8195 Embedded DisplayPort
 driver
From:   CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
To:     Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
        <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <daniel@ffwll.ch>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, <mripard@kernel.org>,
        <tzimmermann@suse.de>, <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <deller@gmx.de>,
        <airlied@linux.ie>
CC:     <msp@baylibre.com>, <granquet@baylibre.com>,
        <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>, <wenst@chromium.org>,
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        <liangxu.xu@mediatek.com>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Aug 2022 13:21:55 +0800
In-Reply-To: <20220805101459.3386-4-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
References: <20220805101459.3386-1-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
         <20220805101459.3386-4-rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Bo-Chen:

On Fri, 2022-08-05 at 18:14 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> 
> This patch adds a embedded displayport driver for the MediaTek mt8195
> SoC.
> 
> It supports the MT8195, the embedded DisplayPort units. It offers
> DisplayPort 1.4 with up to 4 lanes.
> 
> The driver creates a child device for the phy. The child device will
> never exist without the parent being active. As they are sharing a
> register range, the parent passes a regmap pointer to the child so
> that
> both can work with the same register range. The phy driver sets
> device
> data that is read by the parent to get the phy device that can be
> used
> to control the phy properties.
> 
> This driver is based on an initial version by
> Jitao shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> ---

[snip]

> +
> +static void mtk_dp_hpd_sink_event(struct mtk_dp *mtk_dp)
> +{
> +	ssize_t ret;
> +	u8 link_status[DP_LINK_STATUS_SIZE] = {};
> +	u32 link_status_reg = DP_LANE0_1_STATUS;
> +
> +	ret = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&mtk_dp->aux, link_status_reg,
> link_status,
> +			       sizeof(link_status));
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		drm_err(mtk_dp->drm_dev, "Read link status failed\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!drm_dp_channel_eq_ok(link_status, mtk_dp-
> >train_info.lane_count)) {
> +		drm_err(mtk_dp->drm_dev, "Channel EQ failed\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (link_status[1] & DP_REMOTE_CONTROL_COMMAND_PENDING)

I does not see any other DP driver process
DP_REMOTE_CONTROL_COMMAND_PENDING, why mtk dp driver process it? If
this is an advanced function, separate this to an independent patch.

Regards,
CK

> +		drm_dp_dpcd_writeb(&mtk_dp->aux,
> DP_DEVICE_SERVICE_IRQ_VECTOR,
> +				   DP_REMOTE_CONTROL_COMMAND_PENDING);
> +}
> +
>