Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:25:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:25:43 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:27852 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:25:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 12:25:26 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Horst von Brand Cc: Victor Yodaiken , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Coding style - a non-issue Message-ID: <20011202122526.A2622@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Horst von Brand , Victor Yodaiken , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011130200239.A28131@hq2> <200112012318.fB1NI6sW020423@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200112012318.fB1NI6sW020423@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl>; from vonbrand@sleipnir.valparaiso.cl on Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 08:18:06PM -0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 08:18:06PM -0300, Horst von Brand wrote: > Victor Yodaiken said: > > Linux is what it is because of design, not accident. And you know > > that better than anyone. > > I'd say it is better because the mutations themselves (individual patches) > go through a _very_ harsh evaluation before being applied in the "official" > sources. Which is exactly Victor's point. That evaluation is the design. If the mutation argument held water then Linus would apply *ALL* patches and then remove the bad ones. But he doesn't. Which just goes to show that on this mutation nonsense, he's just spouting off. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/