Received: by 2002:a05:6358:e9c4:b0:b2:91dc:71ab with SMTP id hc4csp4640001rwb; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:52:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7x/f+m6nFUdruRqjmJn5VmHHDz09UOD13rFEQOVESjKNFwSXycQFpw75pVZCnblC9Qo02o X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:189d:b0:52d:d4ae:d9f7 with SMTP id x29-20020a056a00189d00b0052dd4aed9f7mr18222496pfh.18.1659959527512; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 04:52:07 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1659959527; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=caK3WZo5DrqlYzyXGLfsiMCEautvMmuV3osXaQYK6su8x1pKn+U8yWFeHXENWeofVZ 6YR3qNytF7lH8F23kAQEf5lu4s3gRyaPl2rIlXcEXfhCnlOXYoUzCpnXB66VviNULoJr ofcdarNY2BRC9BFehsPUtdUJpvAlKerjQbpK9LZ3lTU3RdSP7kIbOUzYI5O2mBiJ60S9 lk3WndXNrYdJYQMJjFVDd8XuSBMcfdJfe97RKqOTKFXIK6nv6Q5Yp+BeMhJ/AUuUqD9z l3fesXgpErWxBrhCttvSSeHsas0cRQBhrj87KipB0p6bA5gdOJqTqrcgBr3FEr8yRIhU dyIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:to:dkim-signature:dkim-signature:from; bh=hxz5dJVKmW1JnSAUI9gZLzzxb4GJLXHvw8kFzNX5wd8=; b=S3DpkW7R8IQwNX4u1WzkZeaDKgPlI9Z39Niqxrc4eyue6ilskyXrGzKwxFlEBDIdyB yL35R1yVcErNvR/sxRkvFfJiRNjC5K9Jof3lTB9ncGr5+mT7aX4ZhercOY6S/lk4/BoK O+883tHQitkwa8043B3FtyTrqDeY4gS5sVva7t4qpSabppYR+FDJyszOvai+VGZh8HYq omRoBHp+AzrReqyZaPL/4Iiie/rHen4kb/wUhGT1n94jZNSCKphybYYCJMXbn72inKqE lOlGsYeyy26Z9neU9SVZf+n+ORz4jjWW5BoD3FZWEGPqTWBKhqUF6/bquJWNEOYc/TZz /S9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=P78VbJbh; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=m4hEevSG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v5-20020a170902ca8500b0016f8f52c95bsi8664572pld.71.2022.08.08.04.51.53; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 04:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=P78VbJbh; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=m4hEevSG; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=linutronix.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242005AbiHHLnC (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Aug 2022 07:43:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46768 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234041AbiHHLm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2022 07:42:57 -0400 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [IPv6:2a0a:51c0:0:12e:550::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C68913D47; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 04:42:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1659958974; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hxz5dJVKmW1JnSAUI9gZLzzxb4GJLXHvw8kFzNX5wd8=; b=P78VbJbhlFpuaRdoY0rRdSHkrmwFXjGAEcXUPHpzToAtrbtJ6quuzWFygkHUaZ/YKn23iH m3hOn3lyMu4XvNbNIm9x3rjaezSOFFoCQryOSpvkCmBS5sPR0foKFa4ImSNp13avNWIMU1 NapzLVC2AF45f6exFgL5eDAE/ElbAjlIlHQZ6ZnvDw2s125p9Q5/iSnf9WaDQ4Z2wswrDZ i1+u07p8TefWOpGDTxKLVKSk8cV1nbwFtPw/jW6vlogwWf4JNNj6F5755wcIPgACCA5M+s 5eytNX+JviKrGszvF3B3CaReaRI5fqiwy/YRzW/zQen+EOXXnlykC1XYrAiyqQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1659958974; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hxz5dJVKmW1JnSAUI9gZLzzxb4GJLXHvw8kFzNX5wd8=; b=m4hEevSGgE4U5+5naPIR6UURVhQTYZGLM8RMnmVGdjavu7mQqxWW7wFigJsRGGYEB+XDxD phOWpBmu6yN2RMBg== To: Yury Norov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Lobakin , Alexei Starovoitov , Alexey Klimov , Andrew Morton , Andrii Nakryiko , Andy Shevchenko , Ben Segall , Christoph Lameter , Dan Williams , Daniel Borkmann , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Dennis Zhou , Dietmar Eggemann , Eric Dumazet , Frederic Weisbecker , Guenter Roeck , Ingo Molnar , Isabella Basso , John Fastabend , Josh Poimboeuf , Juergen Gross , Juri Lelli , KP Singh , Kees Cook , Martin KaFai Lau , Mel Gorman , Miroslav Benes , Nathan Chancellor , "Paul E . McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Randy Dunlap , Rasmus Villemoes , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Song Liu , Steven Rostedt , Tejun Heo , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , Vlastimil Babka , Yonghong Song , Yury Norov , linux-mm@kvack.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] time: optimize tick_check_preferred() In-Reply-To: <87fsi9rcxu.ffs@tglx> References: <20220718192844.1805158-1-yury.norov@gmail.com> <20220718192844.1805158-12-yury.norov@gmail.com> <87fsi9rcxu.ffs@tglx> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:42:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87czdbq7up.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 06 2022 at 10:30, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18 2022 at 12:28, Yury Norov wrote: > >> tick_check_preferred() calls cpumask_equal() even if >> curdev->cpumask == newdev->cpumask. Fix it. > > What's to fix here? It's a pointless operation in a slow path and all > your "fix' is doing is to make the code larger. In fact cpumask_equal() should have the ptr1 == ptr2 check, so you don't have to add it all over the place. Thanks, tglx