Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936748AbXFGUiR (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:38:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934808AbXFGUiH (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:38:07 -0400 Received: from smtp113.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.92]:49073 "HELO smtp113.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S934450AbXFGUiG (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:38:06 -0400 X-YMail-OSG: DX_bQXMVM1mayb29uJ3Wg62p7HlH3bz9cQI5zLDvmQz1OSvOgiJEpeWHDUMISQy0bEys4rJ5NV_B1LYFonOfnVt3GtPz83EKBm.CwawbFjkWYR2nDS60JQ-- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 15:37:57 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Badari Pulavarty Cc: Andrew Morton , Albert Cahalan , lkml , linux-mm , ebiederm@xmission.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] /proc/pid/maps doesn't match "ipcs -m" shmid Message-ID: <20070607203757.GA531@vino.hallyn.com> References: <787b0d920706062027s5a8fd35q752f8da5d446afc@mail.gmail.com> <20070606204432.b670a7b1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <787b0d920706062153u7ad64179p1c4f3f663c3882f@mail.gmail.com> <1181233393.9995.14.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <787b0d920706070943h6ac65b85nee5b01600905be08@mail.gmail.com> <1181235997.9995.23.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <20070607124824.27e909fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1181246363.9995.37.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1181246363.9995.37.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2633 Lines: 64 Quoting Badari Pulavarty (pbadari@us.ibm.com): > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 12:48 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:06:37 -0700 > > Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 12:43 -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > > > > On 6/7/07, Badari Pulavarty wrote: > > > > > > > > > BTW, I agree with Eric that its would be nice to use shmid as part > > > > > of name instead of forcing to be as inode number. It should be > > > > > possible for pmap to workout shmid from "key" or name. Isn't it ? > > > > > > > > It is not at all nice. > > > > > > > > 1. it's incompatible ABI breakage > > > > 2. where will you put the key then, in the inode? :-) > > > > > > Nope. Currently "key" is part of the name (but its not unique). > > > > > > > > > > > Changing to "SYSVID%d" is no good either. Look, people > > > > are ***parsing*** this stuff in /proc. The /proc filesystem > > > > is not some random sandbox to be playing in. > > > > > > > > Before you go messing with it, note that the device number > > > > also matters. (it's per-boot dynamic, but that's OK) > > > > That's how one knows that /SYSV00000000 is not just > > > > a regular file; sadly these didn't get a non-/ prefix. > > > > (and no you can't fix that now; it's way too late) > > > > > > > > Next time you feel like breaking an ABI, mind putting > > > > "LET'S BREAK AN ABI!" in the subject of your email? > > > > > > I am not breaking ABI. Its already broken in the current > > > mainline. I am trying to fix it by putting back the ino# > > > as shmid. Eric had a suggestion that, instead of depending > > > on the inode# to be shmid, we could embed shmid into name > > > (instead of "key" which is currently not unique). > > > > > > > BTW, I suspect this kind of thing also breaks: > > > > a. fuser, lsof, and other resource usage display tools > > > > b. various obscure emulators (similar to valgrind) > > > > > > If you strongly feel that "old" behaviour needs to be retained, > > > > yup, we should put it back. The change was, afaik, accidental. > > > > > here is the patch I originally suggested. > > > > Confused. Will this one-liner fix all the userspace breakage to which > > Albert refers? > > Yes. Albert, please correct me if I am wrong. It will, but could lead to two different inodes with the same i_ino, right? thanks, -serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/