Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 01:09:51 +0200
From:   Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
To:     Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Michael Cheng <michael.cheng@intel.com>,
        Thomas =?iso-8859-15?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= 
        <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/3] drm/i915: pass a pointer for tlb
 seqno at vma_invalidate_tlb()
Message-ID: <YvGXv5td47ky+CnY@alfio.lan>
References: <cover.1659598090.git.mchehab@kernel.org>
 <f9550e6bacea10131ff40dd8981b69eb9251cdcd.1659598090.git.mchehab@kernel.org>
 <YvE75o0uOtDGayNK@alfio.lan>
 <YvFeLbUcC6yiCL5G@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YvFeLbUcC6yiCL5G@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rodrigo,

On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 03:04:13PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 06:37:58PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Mauro,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 09:37:22AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > WRITE_ONCE() should happen at the original var, not on a local
> > > copy of it.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 5d36acb7198b ("drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations")
> > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Thanks and pushed...

Thanks!

> > 
> > Are you going to send it to the stable mailing list?
> 
> I added cc stable while pushing and the cherry-pick to drm-intel-next-fixes
> has the right sha, so I'd assume this would be automagically now.
> But yeap, it would be good if Mauro can follow up whenever this gets
> to Linus tree and Greg's script start to pop up the heads-up messages.

That's what I meant... does Mauro now need to send the e-mail
again for the stable?

I thought there was some suspicion towards e-mails pushed without
being first sent to both stable and upstream mailing lists
because they can get lost or forgotten... maybe I'm wrong.

Andi

> Thanks,
> Rodrigo.
> 
> > 
> > Andi