Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <3971c298-9c9a-83a1-8dc7-5d59dd0e1a05@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Aug 2022 09:08:03 +0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] docs: i2c: i2c-topology: reorder sections more
 logically
Content-Language: en-US
To:     luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20220808141708.1021103-1-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
 <20220808141708.1021103-8-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220808141708.1021103-8-luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 8/8/22 21:17, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com wrote:
> +Mux-locked caveats
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +When using a mux-locked mux, be aware of the following restrictions:
> +
> +* If you build a topology with a mux-locked mux being the parent
> +  of a parent-locked mux, this might break the expectation from the
> +  parent-locked mux that the root adapter is locked during the
> +  transaction.
> +
> +* It is not safe to build arbitrary topologies with two (or more)
> +  mux-locked muxes that are not siblings, when there are address
> +  collisions between the devices on the child adapters of these
> +  non-sibling muxes.
> +
> +  I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device
> +  address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar
> +  operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The
> +  intension with such a topology would in this hypothetical example
> +  be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously,
> +  but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies.
> +

These two sentences in n. 2) can be combined into a single paragraph.
Also, did you mean s/intension/intention/?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara