Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937623AbXFGW20 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:28:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936489AbXFGW2P (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:28:15 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:33016 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764829AbXFGW2N (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:28:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 23:32:58 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Greg KH Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Jones , Kay Sievers , Michal Piotrowski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm1 Message-ID: <20070607233258.063f6cfa@the-village.bc.nu> In-Reply-To: <20070607200102.GA21653@suse.de> References: <1181206091.3625.9.camel@lov.localdomain> <4667D2DF.30207@googlemail.com> <1181228660.3625.23.camel@lov.localdomain> <46682385.1060802@redhat.com> <20070607154342.GA16911@suse.de> <20070607085200.f8d6e2d3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070607155953.GA17591@suse.de> <20070607090632.cfcf02e6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070607161525.GA18363@suse.de> <20070607184805.GA28551@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> <20070607200102.GA21653@suse.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.1 (GTK+ 2.10.8; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1066 Lines: 22 > Ah, but the installer doesn't matter until you do a Fedora 8 release, > right? This is just for people who want to run their own kernel on an > already-set-up Fedora machine. People can and do roll updated install images because you get systems that aren't supported by the released CD boot image. The installer/initrd etc shouldn't keep getting broken by these kind of changes, its about time that all the sysfs type breakage causing patches simply got rejected, like such patches would in every other subsystem. Yes it might cause a little pain, yes someone might have to tweak sysfs a bit to keep compatibility and decouple the external and internal view a bit - Matthew and others pointed out this problem several years ago and predicted the current state of affairs, so its had a lot of time to get fixed. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/